Anglesmith
Setting up the play?
This is probably Feaster's biggest problem - he's an average GM working for a rebuilding, redeveloping and reorganizing team needing excellence from that position.
Another problem for Feaster is that Burke (Whether he can deliver it himself or not) knows what excellence (Or goodness or even "overaverageness") looks like and what happens when he doesn't see it happening?
Well, you can't become a great GM by simply not messing things up on a competitive team, and all great GMs became great GMs by doing great things. If our Flames become a great team, we find out that Feaster is, in fact, a great GM. Chicago's fire-and-brimstone was engineered by Dale Tallon, on his first GM job (not, at the time, a great GM). Similarly to Feaster, Dale Tallon caused controversy with a few potentially-disastrous moves (for Tallon, it was not submitting offers to RFAs in time). Chicago have won two cups as a result of his rebuild. I don't think any more detail needs to be added.