Reinhart
Registered User
- Jun 13, 2011
- 1,623
- 465
This was a long time coming. For those that are saying it was a surprise, or that they didn't see it coming... have you watched the Flames play much this year?
Offensively challenged.
Defensively challenged.
Fantastic analytics.
So... what gives? Looks like a coach that was getting the most out of the players, but the players weren't talented enough. Good underlying numbers always means a good system, right? Well.... you would have to watch the Flames play. It was boring hockey, even during most of the wins. It was no 'trap', but it was boring. Not enough high quality scoring chances - analytics be damned.
This is a very good defensive corps, but is isn't loaded with the stay at home types. How do we explain away that aside from Hamilton, every other defencemen regressed in offence? From Giordano, to Brodie, to Hamonic, to Stone. That's a lot of offence. These are all mostly solid 2-way defencemen that can play both sides well. The offence evaporated under Gulutzan, but the defence wasn't nearly strong enough to compensate. This is a defence that should be suppressing more shots while providing more offence, and I would bet that a capable coach WILL get this defence to play a larger role in games.
This team was terribly easy to defend against. They stuck to the perimeter too much, didn't jam the net nearly enough for those second and third opportunities, and continually made the opposing goalies look like heroes. They didn't get the opposing goalies to move nearly enough. It is tough to score goals in the NHL when an NHL-level goalie is set for each shot.
As well, there was simply an unacceptable number of games in which the Flames seemed ill-prepared to start. Under Hartley, they were such a hard-working team that continually just out-worked the opposing team for 3 periods. Lack of talent, lots of injuries, but a continual high-level of effort. I can't say this about the Flames any longer.
They were boring.
They had a disturbing level of effort.
The coach didn't seem to have many answers and wasn't able to get this team to perform CONSISTENTLY until the final 15 games of the season - in which they were consistently bad.
Terrible PP.
Will a new coach completely turn this around, or will it show that the Flames are simply not talented enough? I will go with the first case. This may not be a powerhouse of a team, but they SHOULD have been better. At the very least, you need a coach that can come in and get this team's effort level to be more consistent. Hopefully, it will be a heck of a lot more enjoyable to watch. The Flames were 'fun' to watch under Hartley with a heck of a lot less talent, and not just because of those 'comebacks' - they were legitimately an exciting team to watch. They were speedy and were all over the ice. This team looks like a team full of 35 year old vets - they play slow, their transition is horribly slow, and they simply didn't 'battle' enough.
Please hire a coach that can make this team at least enjoyable to watch again. Hopefully win AND be enjoyable to watch. I will settle for enjoyable at this point.
Offensively challenged.
Defensively challenged.
Fantastic analytics.
So... what gives? Looks like a coach that was getting the most out of the players, but the players weren't talented enough. Good underlying numbers always means a good system, right? Well.... you would have to watch the Flames play. It was boring hockey, even during most of the wins. It was no 'trap', but it was boring. Not enough high quality scoring chances - analytics be damned.
This is a very good defensive corps, but is isn't loaded with the stay at home types. How do we explain away that aside from Hamilton, every other defencemen regressed in offence? From Giordano, to Brodie, to Hamonic, to Stone. That's a lot of offence. These are all mostly solid 2-way defencemen that can play both sides well. The offence evaporated under Gulutzan, but the defence wasn't nearly strong enough to compensate. This is a defence that should be suppressing more shots while providing more offence, and I would bet that a capable coach WILL get this defence to play a larger role in games.
This team was terribly easy to defend against. They stuck to the perimeter too much, didn't jam the net nearly enough for those second and third opportunities, and continually made the opposing goalies look like heroes. They didn't get the opposing goalies to move nearly enough. It is tough to score goals in the NHL when an NHL-level goalie is set for each shot.
As well, there was simply an unacceptable number of games in which the Flames seemed ill-prepared to start. Under Hartley, they were such a hard-working team that continually just out-worked the opposing team for 3 periods. Lack of talent, lots of injuries, but a continual high-level of effort. I can't say this about the Flames any longer.
They were boring.
They had a disturbing level of effort.
The coach didn't seem to have many answers and wasn't able to get this team to perform CONSISTENTLY until the final 15 games of the season - in which they were consistently bad.
Terrible PP.
Will a new coach completely turn this around, or will it show that the Flames are simply not talented enough? I will go with the first case. This may not be a powerhouse of a team, but they SHOULD have been better. At the very least, you need a coach that can come in and get this team's effort level to be more consistent. Hopefully, it will be a heck of a lot more enjoyable to watch. The Flames were 'fun' to watch under Hartley with a heck of a lot less talent, and not just because of those 'comebacks' - they were legitimately an exciting team to watch. They were speedy and were all over the ice. This team looks like a team full of 35 year old vets - they play slow, their transition is horribly slow, and they simply didn't 'battle' enough.
Please hire a coach that can make this team at least enjoyable to watch again. Hopefully win AND be enjoyable to watch. I will settle for enjoyable at this point.