Flames 2023 Draft position watch - June 28–29, 2023, at Bridgestone Arena in Nashville

MM917

Registered User
Aug 18, 2022
1,094
605
Given the current situation, with the team built as it is, they're going to be picking 15ish or later. You're assuming they win the lottery. Which is bad planning.

I am not assuming they will win the lottery at all that would be as bad as thinking that all you need to do is get into the play-offs and you can win.

I think they can certainly get to the 10th pick though.

And at this point it isn’t like the options are great 15th pick is better than the 16th pick, 13th better than 15th.
 

Kranix

Deranged Homer
Jun 27, 2012
18,347
16,471
15th pick is better than the 16th pick, 13th better than 15th.
After the top 5 it is an utter crap shoot. Teams trade up not because 13th is just better to have than 15, they trade up because everyone's list is different. That seems to be NHL fandom's dearly-held myth, so when their team wins a game, people go, "there goes our good draft position."
 

MM917

Registered User
Aug 18, 2022
1,094
605
But that is an important point you want your team to have the chance to get their guy without trading up, better chance to do that at 10 than 15.
 

Kranix

Deranged Homer
Jun 27, 2012
18,347
16,471
But that is an important point you want your team to have the chance to get their guy without trading up, better chance to do that at 10 than 15.
The point is, your team is getting a guy
 

herashak

Registered User
Mar 24, 2013
5,383
562
We need a playoff thread, going on a heater into the playoffs is the top priority, draft too far away
 

Kranix

Deranged Homer
Jun 27, 2012
18,347
16,471
Winnipeg loses. Feels like we're getting pulled in people.
Nope. Sorry. There's 0% chance of making it. They should be losing out so they can draft Shamov. I really like him. Don't want to get stuck drafting someone like McGriff
 

MM917

Registered User
Aug 18, 2022
1,094
605
Winnipeg loses. Feels like we're getting pulled in people.

The problem is though that Winnipeg losing just means we finish ahead of them, nashville passes both of us with their games in hand and we still finish outside of the play-offs.

Nope. Sorry. There's 0% chance of making it. They should be losing out so they can draft Shamov. I really like him. Don't want to get stuck drafting someone like McGriff

You are right we have been so successful going down the road of mediocrity better keep doing that. TB, Colorado, Pittsburgh etc. all built their Cup winners by staying mediocre for 20 years. That is the sure fire path to success!
 

Kranix

Deranged Homer
Jun 27, 2012
18,347
16,471
You are right we have been so successful going down the road of mediocrity better keep doing that. TB, Colorado, Pittsburgh etc. all built their Cup winners by staying mediocre for 20 years. That is the sure fire path to success!
Waa waa waaa the TB, Col, Pitt argument yet again. I don't know if you're willfully forgetting the Flames took Monahan, Bennett, and Tkachuk 6,4,6 respectively. They haven't cratered again since that little rebuild occurred. This is a mature team and they likely aren't going to be bad enough to get into the top 5 soon. Do you understand how bad Colorado was first for their mini rebuild with Duchene and Landeskog and then how historically awful they became to then draft Mackinnon and Makar? Tampa drafted Stamkos in 2008, and Hedman in 2009. When did Stamkos get his cup? 12 years after being drafted. The Bruins are having an all-time season this year. Where were their core players drafted? Marchand, Bergeron, were second round picks. Pasta, top 5 player in the league, was 26th. Hampus Lindholm and Zacha are former high picks who busted relatively speaking and were acquired via trade.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yepthatsme

MM917

Registered User
Aug 18, 2022
1,094
605
6,4,6 isn’t cratering we could have got better players had the team been willing to do the necessary things to actual rebuild but instead we are stuck winning nothing, competing for nothing.

So you solution is to point at the Bruins and hope you get insanely lucky with drafting. LOL what a solid plan that is.

We have seen for 20+ years that being mediocre gets you nowhere but maybe this time it will be different.
 

Fig

Absolute Horse Shirt
Dec 15, 2014
12,995
8,459
6,4,6 isn’t cratering we could have got better players had the team been willing to do the necessary things to actual rebuild but instead we are stuck winning nothing, competing for nothing.

So you solution is to point at the Bruins and hope you get insanely lucky with drafting. LOL what a solid plan that is.

We have seen for 20+ years that being mediocre gets you nowhere but maybe this time it will be different.

Kulak, Brodie, Gio, Hathaway, Lomberg, Mangiapane, Gaudreau, Ferland, Bouma, Fox, Ruzicka, Wolf...

You don't have to point at the Bruins. We have a scouting staff capable of this.

But I also get where you're coming from relating to the concept of lukewarm.
 

Yepthatsme

Registered User
Oct 25, 2020
1,457
1,473
Waa waa waaa the TB, Col, Pitt argument yet again. I don't know if you're willfully forgetting the Flames took Monahan, Bennett, and Tkachuk 6,4,6 respectively. They haven't cratered again since that little rebuild occurred. This is a mature team and they likely aren't going to be bad enough to get into the top 5 soon. Do you understand how bad Colorado was first for their mini rebuild with Duchene and Landeskog and then how historically awful they became to then draft Mackinnon and Makar? Tampa drafted Stamkos in 2008, and Hedman in 2009. When did Stamkos get his cup? 12 years after being drafted. The Bruins are having an all-time season this year. Where were their core players drafted? Marchand, Bergeron, were second round picks. Pasta, top 5 player in the league, was 26th. Hampus Lindholm and Zacha are former high picks who busted relatively speaking and were acquired via trade.
But if we don’t bottom out and perennially get top picks, how are we ever going to become as good as noted juggernauts like Columbus (five top 10 picks since 2012), Arizona (five top 10 picks, 3 top 5 picks since 2015), Buffalo (ten top 10 picks over the last 10 years which is crazy to type). Maybe if we get lucky, it’ll only take us eleven top 10 picks since 2007 like Edmonton to become… a wildcard team. Or even like Toronto, who just had to be bad from 2006 on until they could finally almost win a round last year. 14 years after our first top 3 pick, we might even win it all like the Colorado Avalanche did. Wouldn’t want to be stuck in mediocrity like the Bruins, Dallas Stars, that Minnesota team going on a run, or that Rangers team who used their high picks to get… 20ish goals this year.

More than one way to skin a cat, and being bad certainly doesn’t guarantee being good in the next decade or so.
 

MM917

Registered User
Aug 18, 2022
1,094
605
Kulak, Brodie, Gio, Hathaway, Lomberg, Mangiapane, Gaudreau, Ferland, Bouma, Fox, Ruzicka, Wolf...

You don't have to point at the Bruins. We have a scouting staff capable of this.

But I also get where you're coming from relating to the concept of lukewarm.

Very few of those come close to Bergeron, Marchand and Pasternak which is the problem. They get ok but not over the top to actually compete.

The drafting group has been here for long enough and with the current GM long enough that if they were going to build a competitive team with non-top picks it would have already happened.
 

MM917

Registered User
Aug 18, 2022
1,094
605
But if we don’t bottom out and perennially get top picks, how are we ever going to become as good as noted juggernauts like Columbus (five top 10 picks since 2012), Arizona (five top 10 picks, 3 top 5 picks since 2015), Buffalo (ten top 10 picks over the last 10 years which is crazy to type). Maybe if we get lucky, it’ll only take us eleven top 10 picks since 2007 like Edmonton to become… a wildcard team. Or even like Toronto, who just had to be bad from 2006 on until they could finally almost win a round last year. 14 years after our first top 3 pick, we might even win it all like the Colorado Avalanche did. Wouldn’t want to be stuck in mediocrity like the Bruins, Dallas Stars, that Minnesota team going on a run, or that Rangers team who used their high picks to get… 20ish goals this year.

More than one way to skin a cat, and being bad certainly doesn’t guarantee being good in the next decade or so.

The teams you list all had bad management groups. If we have that same level of incompetence it doesn't matter if we bottom out, go for it or stay in the middle it won't work. Nobody is advocating for tanking and having terrible GM's. Nobody is saying that drafting high automatically means multiple Cups either. But what is clear that having mediocre players, playing mediocre hockey is 100% a guarantee to not win. There are no examples of mediocre teams winning the Cup. Even the closest examples that people would want to use in LA or St. Louis had elite level players that we currently do not have on the team, do not have in the system and do not have the ability to add.

How are the Bruins stuck in mediocrity they have won a Cup, went to the finals? the Minnesota team going on a run? They have won nothing, competed for nothing, that is the goal now?
 

Fig

Absolute Horse Shirt
Dec 15, 2014
12,995
8,459
Very few of those come close to Bergeron, Marchand and Pasternak which is the problem. They get ok but not over the top to actually compete.

The drafting group has been here for long enough and with the current GM long enough that if they were going to build a competitive team with non-top picks it would have already happened.

Pasta is a first rounder.

Berg and Marchand are 2nd and 3rd rounders IIRC? Fox, Gaudreau and perhaps Gio would have qualified, no?

But yes, it is a bigger uphill battle with this approach vs being ultra bad to get superstar calibre players.
 

Kranix

Deranged Homer
Jun 27, 2012
18,347
16,471
There are no examples of mediocre teams winning the Cup.
Holy shit what a revelation!!

Huberdeau isn't a mediocre player, and he was drafted 3rd overall. 2nd in points last season. Neither is Kadri, 7th overall. On long term deals. Now they have to figure out how to surround them, while continuing to draft well.
 

Bounces R Way

Registered User
Nov 18, 2013
34,496
54,782
Weegartown
Winnipeg loses. Feels like we're getting pulled in people.

obligatory
giphy.gif
 

DomBarr

Registered User
Apr 7, 2014
2,758
902
Holy shit what a revelation!!

Huberdeau isn't a mediocre player, and he was drafted 3rd overall. 2nd in points last season. Neither is Kadri, 7th overall. On long term deals. Now they have to figure out how to surround them, while continuing to draft well.
they aren't mediocre but they are not players you build around both were drafted as cornerstone pieces but never developed into those cornerstones otherwise they would still be with the Leafs and Panthers.
 

Bounces R Way

Registered User
Nov 18, 2013
34,496
54,782
Weegartown
Wouldn't be surprised if the Flames try to move up in this draft. They need a high ceiling center in the worst way.

Yager is the name that intrigues me the most after the top 5-6 guys.
Great skater with a great shot, Western Canadian kid, might fall out of the top 10.

Some other centers I'd be happy with are Danielson, Heidt, or Dvorsky. Please no Matthew Wood, he is an ugly skater. Can't say I've seen or liked much of what I've read about the defenseman in this draft, but that could just be a good opportunity to pick one in the later portion of the 1st.
 
Last edited:

Yepthatsme

Registered User
Oct 25, 2020
1,457
1,473
The teams you list all had bad management groups. If we have that same level of incompetence it doesn't matter if we bottom out, go for it or stay in the middle it won't work. Nobody is advocating for tanking and having terrible GM's. Nobody is saying that drafting high automatically means multiple Cups either. But what is clear that having mediocre players, playing mediocre hockey is 100% a guarantee to not win. There are no examples of mediocre teams winning the Cup. Even the closest examples that people would want to use in LA or St. Louis had elite level players that we currently do not have on the team, do not have in the system and do not have the ability to add.

How are the Bruins stuck in mediocrity they have won a Cup, went to the finals? the Minnesota team going on a run? They have won nothing, competed for nothing, that is the goal now?
“Mediocre teams don’t win in cups” is an asinine statement, but plenty of teams go from mediocre to considered good the moment they start winning, people have a tendency to rewrite history. LA lost more games than they won the season they won the cup, St Louis was obviously was one of the worst teams in the league before winning. Anaheim won 29 games total the season prior before making the conference finals in 3 of 4 years. Do you think there is only good teams and bad teams just constantly switching places?

Players are remembered much differently after cup wins/runs as well, case in point how O’Reilly was viewed before and after their cup as the most blatant example, as well as players like Pietrangelo, D. Teows, Point, Kessel etc. Any or a couple of Huberdeau, Lindholm, Kadri, Tanev, Kylington and Markstrom play like they’ve all proven they can next year, this team can easily find success. Then everyone will spiel out “Everyone knew they had the talent, they had the highest producing winger in the league from two seasons ago/the goalie who was runner up for the Vezina and Jennings a season prior/ a guy who almost won the Selke while scoring 40/a guy who was on pace for 100 points as a 2C/one of the best defensive defensemen in the league”. Mediocre is such an abject way of trying to write things off. Tage Thompson was just a mediocre prospect. Patrice Bergeron was just a mediocre 1C. (although I was always a massive fan, with him and Teows being favorites from the early 2010s). Carolina/NYI were just mediocre teams.

Was hoping you could notice the bit of sarcasm there but it was lost on you, just showing you a list of teams who haven’t done anything close to bottoming out who are looking pretty good around the league today.
 

MM917

Registered User
Aug 18, 2022
1,094
605
Holy shit what a revelation!!

Huberdeau isn't a mediocre player, and he was drafted 3rd overall. 2nd in points last season. Neither is Kadri, 7th overall. On long term deals. Now they have to figure out how to surround them, while continuing to draft well.

he isn't the level of player that leads his team to a Cup.

Who is the Cup winning team that had a best player the level of Hubredeau?
 

MM917

Registered User
Aug 18, 2022
1,094
605
“Mediocre teams don’t win in cups” is an asinine statement, but plenty of teams go from mediocre to considered good the moment they start winning, people have a tendency to rewrite history. LA lost more games than they won the season they won the cup, St Louis was obviously was one of the worst teams in the league before winning. Anaheim won 29 games total the season prior before making the conference finals in 3 of 4 years. Do you think there is only good teams and bad teams just constantly switching places?

LA was far from mediocre. They had guys like Kopitar and Doughty who are much better than any player we have. They had Mike Richards, Jeff Carter in support that are at the level of our top players. They also perfectly fit the system they play which we do not, our players don't fit any system because they aren't good enough.

Anaheim had Perry, Getlzlaf, Pronger and Niedermayer LOL but sure they are mediocre.

Players are remembered much differently after cup wins/runs as well, case in point how O’Reilly was viewed before and after their cup as the most blatant example, as well as players like Pietrangelo, D. Teows, Point, Kessel etc. Any or a couple of Huberdeau, Lindholm, Kadri, Tanev, Kylington and Markstrom play like they’ve all proven they can next year, this team can easily find success. Then everyone will spiel out “Everyone knew they had the talent, they had the highest producing winger in the league from two seasons ago/the goalie who was runner up for the Vezina and Jennings a season prior/ a guy who almost won the Selke while scoring 40/a guy who was on pace for 100 points as a 2C/one of the best defensive defensemen in the league”. Mediocre is such an abject way of trying to write things off. Tage Thompson was just a mediocre prospect. Patrice Bergeron was just a mediocre 1C. (although I was always a massive fan, with him and Teows being favorites from the early 2010s). Carolina/NYI were just mediocre teams.

What a complete load of shit. We don't have a player close to Pietranglo on defense. He didn't get credit for the Cup run he was a top defenseman before that. None of our defensemen have anything close to that level of talent.

The list of garbage you list from our team isn't getting close to the level of players that you list.

We will keep being mediocre, our loser fans will continue to pretend that it is leading somewhere because they have no ambition and are happy to cheer on garbage that achieves nothing.
 

Kranix

Deranged Homer
Jun 27, 2012
18,347
16,471
he isn't the level of player that leads his team to a Cup.

Who is the Cup winning team that had a best player the level of Hubredeau?
You mean what cup winner had a guy who led the league in assists?
 

Fig

Absolute Horse Shirt
Dec 15, 2014
12,995
8,459
Win or lose, I think I found the perfect response going forward. Response starts at 1:18.

 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad