I am putting this under science because of the tools used to actually try and confirm that the book was at one time owned by Shakespeare.
https://www.cbc.ca/radio/asithappen...own-book-from-shakespeare-s-library-1.6041155
It's pretty cool how modern tech can help find hidden secrets from centuries ago.
"But reading those notes was no easy feat, as the book had been literally washed, trimmed and rebound in 1731. Weir says he used digital imagining and ultraviolet light to reconstruct the annotations.
"Sure enough, I got all sorts of good results — signatures and marginal comments," he said.
"That's the sort of thing that told me that it was Shakespeare's book because, well, he signed it a number of times. And there are notes that say that he used this or that passage for this or that play.""
WS below believed to be his denoting his notes on the right.
https://www.cbc.ca/radio/asithappen...own-book-from-shakespeare-s-library-1.6041155
It's pretty cool how modern tech can help find hidden secrets from centuries ago.
"But reading those notes was no easy feat, as the book had been literally washed, trimmed and rebound in 1731. Weir says he used digital imagining and ultraviolet light to reconstruct the annotations.
"Sure enough, I got all sorts of good results — signatures and marginal comments," he said.
"That's the sort of thing that told me that it was Shakespeare's book because, well, he signed it a number of times. And there are notes that say that he used this or that passage for this or that play.""
WS below believed to be his denoting his notes on the right.