NyQuil
Big F$&*in Q
This is right also. The NHL pretty much said that the IOC should cover their costs, or compensate them with promotion and marketing.
Something the IOC doesn't do for any other sport?
This is right also. The NHL pretty much said that the IOC should cover their costs, or compensate them with promotion and marketing.
This could get ugly...won't be long before players follow suit. What punishments could come out of this?
I dont know what you are even responding too. The poster called the WC slanted because the IIHF put it during the SC playoffs. In truth, it is just as much on the NHL where they put their season, and they CHOOSE not to align it with the WC, for any reasons.
Now, on a side note, if you knew Europe you would hardly call the Bundesliga, the Champions League and the Russian football league "second rate". It isnt like the hockey leagues only compete against their national football leagues, since football is not at all gate driven. You rather have to look at all of the European football as the NCAA, with each league as an individual college conference.
I still think they'll overturn this decision
It's not the NHL's fault that the Europeans wanna play here. If they aren't under contract I see no need for the nhl to play what are free agents and not slaves
This could get ugly...won't be long before players follow suit. What punishments could come out of this?
the next cba guaranteed contracts are not so much guaranteed anymore ? because as much as a small minority of the PA really really really want to go to the olympics a much larger percentage of owners would really really really like to get out from under bad contracts.
Both the IIHF and NHL chooses the timing of their championships (and also the regular season in the NHL's case) to maximize TV viewership and profits. That's the way sports works these days.
Of course not.
However, this is no ordinary business, and I freely admit that I'm not impartial in this. It's not MY business, and quite frankly, all I care about is my team winning the gold medal. As you can see by my avatar, my favorite team is the Boston Bruins - owned by Jeremy Jacobs. If you look at some of my posts, you'll see that not only do I not care what's best for him, I'm eagerly looking forward to the day he actually departs this earth. The sooner the better.
I care NOTHING about what's financially best for the NHL owners. They certainly don't know me or care about what's best for me, do they?
If that makes me a selfish ******* because my wanting the best American players playing in the Olympics hurts the owners of the NHL - then I'm a selfish *******. To me, the financial well-being of the NHL owners means less than nothing. They're billionaires. I have no sympathy. None.
Gotcha, all crap it is for you. To each his own.
My point was that it is ridiculous to pull out the injury excuse, when a player, if not at the Olympics, could be injured at the WCOH (or in training, or in the NHL) as easily. Bottom line, a player suffering an injury is bad, irregardless of where it happened. Lastly, if the possibility of injury is a strong factor in not going to the Olympics, it should be as equally a strong factor against going to the WCOH. Double standards = not good.
Of course not.
If that makes me a selfish ******* because my wanting the best American players playing in the Olympics hurts the owners of the NHL - then I'm a selfish *******. To me, the financial well-being of the NHL owners means less than nothing. They're billionaires. I have no sympathy. None.
I see European/Russian posters talk of how they don't follow the NHL ("not participating"), they only follow players from their home country...does that mean they should stop mocking the NHL? Does "participate or shut up" mean they should stop posting in the NHL Forum?Because one can't refuse an invitation to participate in something and then proceed to mock the competition. Participate or shut up.
I'm fully expecting this as well.
The NHL can say "case closed! we'll NEVER change our minds!" and then turn around and reverse that decision tomorrow. Who's to stop them? It's not like their words become law, this is all PR talk until the 2018 schedule is drawn up.
They'll find some thing to squeeze the NHLPA for, and the PA will bend, and it'll be like this never happened.
Do you write contracts and legal texts for a living?
Hey, if Bettman wants to let the KHL win the pro hockey PR game outside of the States, I guess the Russians will love to capitalize on this. Let the KHL expand into the UK, Asia, and beyond...while the NHL is confined by its own borders and has little following outside of North America.
Small thinking by a small man. It suits him.
the next cba guaranteed contracts are not so much guaranteed anymore ? because as much as a small minority of the PA really really really want to go to the olympics a much larger percentage of owners would really really really like to get out from under bad contracts.
The IOC is awful do they pay for anyone's training? All I can see is them making countries take on debt to make profitSo dont come with ******** that the NHL suddenly cared about not taking money from the grassroots of the IIHF. The IOC money would be taken from stipends going to young athletes as well.
I could definitely see it. That and potential ramifications to the Team for allowing them to leave? For every player they allow to leave, they lose a draft pick or automatically move to the bottom in every round type crap.
Watching something (frequently briefly) "because it's on" over the holiday season does not in any way mean there's "attachment" IMO2016 - WHC - TSN set a record with 4.6 million unique viewers.
2017 - WJHC - TSN sets record with 11 million unique viewers.
Amazing how attached Canada is to that tournament.
The players under those bad contracts will be smart enough to not give their clubs a reason to terminate them by just leaving midseason. With guys like Ovechkin or other reasonably good players, their teams won't be happy, they'll suspend them for the time they're away and in the event of an injury for that duration and let the players know that beforehand, but I don't think there's too much going to happen.
I'm fully expecting this as well.
The NHL can say "case closed! we'll NEVER change our minds!" and then turn around and reverse that decision tomorrow. Who's to stop them? It's not like their words become law, this is all PR talk until the 2018 schedule is drawn up.
They'll find some thing to squeeze the NHLPA for, and the PA will bend, and it'll be like this never happened.
It's impossible to place exact numbers on what the NHL gains and what it loses. So this has to be conclusion based on theory. The theory is clear.
During an Olympics year, the NHL still plays 82 games of revenue. It still has the playoffs and the Cup. NHL fans and players aren't quitting the game in droves because they have to take a short vacation from the game. On the contrary, many are now watching hockey even more fascinating that will drive up their demand for the NHL product. International playing talent and consuming fan demand is captivated by the Olympics, developed in their home countries, and exported to the NHL. That short break in the NHL gives most players an extended rest for the stretch run too, helping the quality of play when it matters most. The ONLY significant risk for the NHL is a career-altering injury to a star player. When has that last happened? But even that is small in the grand scheme of things. It will be much worse if that talent never takes up hockey because of the dilution of the Olympics.
Since the potential negative effects of the Olympics are more often isolated to individual teams, it's the NHL's job to say to the owners that they have no choice. The players are going. Problem solved. International hockey, and the NHL, is better for it.
The IOC is awful do they pay for anyone's training? All I can see is them making countries take on debt to make profit