well
Well according to what I've heard Soskin has paid his bills and players on time.
Maybe his approach is like the new franchise in NY
The franchise in Watertown NY is owned by a group of local businessmen who went into the deal expecting to lose money. And they probably did. But are using it as a tax write off and that was part of their plan from the outset. they told any potential investors that if they expected to make money etc. they were not going to be happy.
The League owned franchise may have done OK re: players bills etc. but there was turnover in management during the season and that probably was related to money. But the players played hard and competed every night. Not sure how the attendance was but I think they got fairly good local support.
I've heard there's a rumor that some portion of the Whaler ownership may take over the Berkshire franchise. Not sure where that would leave the Whalers though they had good attendance but were financially strapped most of the season.
As for SW PA well........ not sure how that's going to play out if "Sticks and Stilletos" is coming back as owner she better bring deep pockets because it was a real struggle to put 15 players on the ice for the last 4-6 weeks of the season.
Frankly, the model used by the new Watertown NY franchise is a good one. It's viable financially and they were able to recruit and attract a good group of players.
Yes, they were young for the most part, and yes the league is primarily a young players league. But a number of the players got opportunities to play up in either the SP or the Coast for different periods of time.
In addition to finding viable ownership groups along the Watertown model the league should try and build partnerships with both SP and Coast teams and formalize them in some way to provide opportunities for player development and transfer from one league/team to the other.
But hey this is just my opinion, everyone has one.
F1