Toggle sidebar

Fenway Sports Group, LeBron James teaming up for NBA expansion team in Las Vegas UPD Leiweke/OVG proposes another casino/arena location

Bucky_Hoyt

Registered User
Dec 11, 2005
612
53
Singapore
Voight said:
Just because they have a lot of people, it doesn't automatically mean they will support a 2nd pro team. I just don't see an NBA team working there. & i highly doubt they are even on the NBAs radar for expansion.
Click to expand...
Support, population, and a financial backer. Gotta have all 3 and that is probably why we aren't seeing more sports teams coming to Canada's 3 largest metros.

MLB has had some buzz with Montreal but was predicated on a relocation from Tampa. That may now be dead in the water. Highly doubt an ownership group wants to pony up a 2+ Billion expansion fee and at least a 1+ Billion ballpark.

NBA in Montreal? Should be less expensive than MLB if they can use the Bell Centre but no one has come forward. What would an expansion/relo go for now? 1-1.5 Billion?

Neither MLB or NBA has had any real ownership group come forward for Vancouver. Again, NBA would be significantly cheaper than MLB but likely priced out of that market.
 
OG6ix

OG6ix

Registered User
Apr 11, 2006
4,476
1,386
Toronto
BKIslandersFan said:
Why not? Win and fans will come.
Click to expand...
It's his opinion he literally has no factual information to back up his stance other than "It's a hockey town." Again, I heard this kinda rhetic as a kid and even then the raptors crowd was predominantly white. Now it's definitely a mosiac but there are a ton of white basketball fans. It's just that hockey is the only sport that most has white fans - in his world only minorities will support a team. He's a borderline racist.

Nevermind that I posed the scenario that the league is not gate driven so attendance isn't a huge factor like the NHL. Also there is a group in MTL exploring it - Michael fornier and Garda world ceo. Whether they get a team or have the financing I dunno. Either way the NBA is a good investment even if it's 2 or 3 billion.
 
OG6ix

OG6ix

Registered User
Apr 11, 2006
4,476
1,386
Toronto
blueandgoldguy said:
Plans are still on the table for an MLB team in Montreal. $1 billion for a relocated team and likely between $650 - $750 million for a 35,000 seat outdoor stadium.
Click to expand...

No chance it's only a billion for a relocated team. The outdoor stadium definitely would go closer to the 750 million if there is no roof which I think they will want like safeco.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Voight

blueandgoldguy

Registered User
Oct 8, 2010
5,294
2,554
Greg's River Heights
OG6ix said:
No chance it's only a billion for a relocated team. The outdoor stadium definitely would go closer to the 750 million if there is no roof which I think they will want like safeco.
Click to expand...
Yeah, it's likely a billion for Tampa, maybe 1.1 - 1.2 billion at most. There aren't any options for the teams to relocate anywhere else at this point given lack of infrastructure. Demand is limited.

There won't be a roof on the new stadium should Montreal go ahead with one.
 
OG6ix

OG6ix

Registered User
Apr 11, 2006
4,476
1,386
Toronto
blueandgoldguy said:
Yeah, it's likely a billion for Tampa, maybe 1.1 - 1.2 billion at most. There aren't any options for the teams to relocate anywhere else at this point given lack of infrastructure. Demand is limited.

There won't be a roof on the new stadium should Montreal go ahead with one.
Click to expand...
Apparently they had two plans, one with no roof, another with a roof/canopy.
 
BigBadBruins7708

BigBadBruins7708

Registered User
Dec 11, 2017
13,705
18,568
Las Vegas
LadyStanley said:
With Southpoint and this, perhaps a "South Strip"?
Click to expand...

I can see it sparking that. Especially since in addition to South Point you also have Silverton right there and a ton of untouched land against the 15 south of Blue Diamond. Too bad M isn't closer or they could get in on it too
 

aqib

Registered User
Feb 13, 2012
5,240
1,294
Just thinking out loud. Its weird to me that the Adelson's sold all their Vegas properties and then bought into the Mavs. Why wouldn't they have been at the front of the line for a Vegas NBA team?
 
BigBadBruins7708

BigBadBruins7708

Registered User
Dec 11, 2017
13,705
18,568
Las Vegas
aqib said:
Just thinking out loud. Its weird to me that the Adelson's sold all their Vegas properties and then bought into the Mavs. Why wouldn't they have been at the front of the line for a Vegas NBA team?
Click to expand...

Mostly because FSG is that powerful of a group. Pretty much when FSG/Lebron says they want the Vegas franchise, they're getting it. The NBA isn't going to snub them
 
Voight

Voight

#winning
Feb 8, 2012
40,705
17,084
Mulberry Street
aqib said:
Just thinking out loud. Its weird to me that the Adelson's sold all their Vegas properties and then bought into the Mavs. Why wouldn't they have been at the front of the line for a Vegas NBA team?
Click to expand...

Thanks to LeBron.

He wants to be the face of a team and have significant ownership in any Vegas team. He already has a small piece of FSG so he's going to partner with them. NBA will give Bron first shot at a team.
 
KevFu

KevFu

Registered User
May 22, 2009
9,206
3,436
Phoenix from Rochester via New Orleans
I'm eager to get to the 32-team era for MLB and NBA simply because pausing your growth at 30 teams and going 20-30 years without expansion from thirty has NEVER MADE AN OUNCE OF SENSE.

I mean, MLB only went to 30 because of lawsuits, but six divisions instead of four or eight is just silly and dumb. Once they had to go to 30, they should have been looking for 31 and 32.

And the NBA has even less of an excuse because baseball stadiums are huge and costs billions, while there's like AT LEAST 30 arenas NBA teams could move into right now.
 

oknazevad

Registered User
Dec 12, 2018
470
330
Plus the NBA could have expanded on team at a time as they've done in the past (and as the NHL did with Vegas and Seattle coming in a few years apart) as it's relatively easy to have teams' days off line up so there's always at least one team off. MLB couldn't really do bay because of the need for an even number of teams since they play almost every day.
 
BigBadBruins7708

BigBadBruins7708

Registered User
Dec 11, 2017
13,705
18,568
Las Vegas
oknazevad said:
Plus the NBA could have expanded on team at a time as they've done in the past (and as the NHL did with Vegas and Seattle coming in a few years apart) as it's relatively easy to have teams' days off line up so there's always at least one team off. MLB couldn't really do bay because of the need for an even number of teams since they play almost every day.
Click to expand...

Also true.

Though I think Vegas joins the NBA as a pair with Seattle getting the Sonics back
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Ad

Latest posts

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom