Expansion: 32 teams and 4 conferences

Blue And Orange

Oilers & Seahawks
Jan 21, 2010
2,773
4
Toronto
Anyone recall in 2011, the NHL tried a radical 4-conference proposal that was suppose to be implemented after the 2011-12 season? With Las Vegas and Quebec City submitting application for expansion, it's fun to speculate what the league would look like in a 32-team league. To achieve symmetry, one of DET or CBJ has to move back to the Western Conference and this might be a tough sell for the NHL. As such, this is why I think the NHL will move to a 4 conference realignment. No more East vs West, now its West, Midwest, Central, and East.

Schedule Matrix:
-34 games vs conference opponents (4 or 5 games against each of your 7 conference opponents, at least 2H and 2A)
-48 games vs other 24 opponents outside your conference (2 games each 1 H and 1 A)

Playoffs:
-Top 3 teams in each conference are guaranteed a playoff spot
-4 wildcard teams (regardless of conference)
-WC that occupies 4th place in conference will remain in that conference
-WC outside conference top 4 will be seeded depending on their point total and the point total of the conference leader (cross-overs)
-1st round: 1 vs 4/WC; 2 vs 3
-2nd round: two remaining teams in each conference battle it out
-3rd round: four conference champions are re-seeded according to point total (1 vs 4, 2 vs 3)
-SCF: two remaining teams

11823047_10155851877210032_5655547452116481177_o.jpg


11822864_10155851877340032_7636969336312576682_n.jpg


Just thought I'd put it out there. It's always fun to speculate :nod:
 

thadd

Oil4Life
Jun 9, 2007
26,717
2,718
Canada
I like your west and midwest, but I'd rather go with north and south

North: Quebec, Montreal, Ottawa, Toronto, Buffalo, Boston, NYR, NYI
South: Columbus, Pittsburg, Philly, NJ, Carolina, Tampa, Florida
 

OmNomNom

Taco is Love, Taco is Life
Mar 3, 2011
22,992
15,852
In the Church of Salmela
I like your west and midwest, but I'd rather go with north and south

North: Quebec, Montreal, Ottawa, Toronto, Buffalo, Boston, NYR, NYI
South: Columbus, Pittsburg, Philly, NJ, Carolina, Tampa, Florida

not enough islanders/rangers for philly and NJ.


basically, realignment is gonna leave a large group of fans unhappy no matter what
 

Jimmi McJenkins

Sometimes miracles
Jan 12, 2006
75,485
35,018
Alberta
I suspect Columbus would move "mid-west" before Detroit, because I think that the NHL promised them something to the effect of staying in the East.
 

Jimmi McJenkins

Sometimes miracles
Jan 12, 2006
75,485
35,018
Alberta
There were a couple looks..one had a Canada west and Canada east division

This is what I was thinking as well.

Canada West - Edm, Cal, Van & Wpg

Pacific Coast - SJ, LA, Ana & LV

South - Ari, Dal, Col & STL

Great Lakes - Chi, Min, Det & Buf

Canada East - Tor, Mtl, Ott & Que

South Atlantic - Fla, TB, Car & Nsh

Pen-Central - Clb, Pit, Phi & Wsh

East Coast - NYR, NYI, NJ & Bos
 

Blue And Orange

Oilers & Seahawks
Jan 21, 2010
2,773
4
Toronto
The reason I chose Detroit to move to the "Midwest Conference" is to rekindle some old rivalries like Chicago/Detroit, Colorado/Detroit, and St Louis/Detroit.

This isn't moving Detroit to the Western Conference form the Eastern Confernece. This is putting Detroit in the "Midwest Conference" in a league with FOUR conferences. Essentially, the Wings are in a conference with 6 CTZ teams and 1 MTZ, which happens to be their biggest rival of the late 90s. I'm sure the Wings would consider it.

What's an extra two or three 9 PM ET starts going to do? Besides, most CTZ start their games around 8:00 and 8:30 PM ET anyways.
 

s7ark

RIP
Jul 3, 2003
27,579
174
Detroit will not come back to the Western Conference. That was agreed upon with the NHL.

This. There is no chance the Wing return to the west. A much more likely situation to even out the east/west would be the Panthers eventually moving to Seattle/Portland
 

snag

Registered User
Feb 22, 2014
8,805
9,631
I would say the "central" division as it is drawn there would need to be broken up to make for more travel. As a family man as are many pro hockey players. I would want as little travel as possible so I would naturally want to go there. Geography already works against several teams, why make it even worse by making an entire conference the premiere destination? And I get it is already that way...but here is the chance to fix that (as difficult as it might be considering the "density" of the teams).

Also, as a Canadian, I hate the idea of having conferences made up of nothing but "us" where we are guaranteed to cannibalize each other out of the playoffs. I get how it could be exciting...but...meh....I want to see as many Canadian teams get as far as possible in the playoffs and then feast on each other :popcorn:
 

evdog

Registered User
Oct 15, 2014
103
20
San diego
How about eliminating the geographical basis for divisions/conferences and set them up with random distribution (with a goal to have an equal geographic distribution). This would put all teams on an equal footing in terms of travel burden. And more importantly the league can go back to historically relevant and interesting division and conference names rather than the bland generic ones in use today.
 

shoop

Registered User
Jul 6, 2008
8,333
1,911
Edmonton
This. There is no chance the Wing return to the west. A much more likely situation to even out the east/west would be the Panthers eventually moving to Seattle/Portland

There is the problem. No one wants to re-align to the West.

Columbus and Detroit both fought tooth and nail to stay move to the East. They won't move West without a fight.

The only chance you bring Quebec city in is by moving a team from the East.
 

Game 8

Registered User
Mar 8, 2003
2,196
125
Like the Op's layout. Phoenix and Vegas need the Canadian teams to draw crowds and I'm being selfish! :)
 

Bangers

Registered User
May 31, 2006
3,919
868
This is what I was thinking as well.

Canada West - Edm, Cal, Van & Wpg

Pacific Coast - SJ, LA, Ana & LV

South - Ari, Dal, Col & STL

Great Lakes - Chi, Min, Det & Buf

Canada East - Tor, Mtl, Ott & Que

South Atlantic - Fla, TB, Car & Nsh

Pen-Central - Clb, Pit, Phi & Wsh

East Coast - NYR, NYI, NJ & Bos

I would possibly switch BUF and CLB, but I really like this idea. Have Can West, Pacific, South and Great Lakes in one conference and the others in another.

Call me old-fashioned, but I wish the NHL would bring back division names (eg. Norris division, etc.)
 

Jimmi McJenkins

Sometimes miracles
Jan 12, 2006
75,485
35,018
Alberta
I would possibly switch BUF and CLB, but I really like this idea. Have Can West, Pacific, South and Great Lakes in one conference and the others in another.

Call me old-fashioned, but I wish the NHL would bring back division names (eg. Norris division, etc.)

I would prefer the old names as well, I was thinking Geographically. Plus, I had Buf and Clb where they are because I felt it fit better geographically.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad