Have you looked at what is being discussed in the clip. To verify if what is being said is accurate? The way I look at it is an opinion on a newsworthy story. On the surface I have no idea if what is being said is true so the onus is on me to look into it. Its no different if CNN or CBC do the same. Important facts could be left out that help explain the situation. I would like to think there are some independent people who are passionate about gaining a better understanding.
In this clip they are speaking about Nicholas Wade, a British author and journalist. He served as the staff writer for the Science Times section of The New York Times from 1982 to 2012.
Here is the article they are speaking of:
The origin of COVID: Did people or nature open Pandora’s box at Wuhan? - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
It is up to you whether or not to take it further or classify it as some guy on a street corner.
I still don't get why people don't actually listen to what is being said objectively and try to learn more about it. The simplicity of it is that people really don't care except for telling you that you can't be right . that's easy.
If I post a clip someone always argues about the messenger but never actually critics the message I'm not trying to preach but expose an opinion that should be worthy of debate.
I posted a clip about the virus possibly being released from a lab a year ago but because it wasn't a mainstream story it couldn't have been even close to the truth. Instead people are shown wet markets that have been around for thousands of years and people eating bat soup as a way to fill in the blanks because the public demands answers.(they don't even have to be right) They log that in their subconscious and never need to update their opinion, like with most media stories.
There is sensationalism everywhere but in it there is a story that is waiting to be understood.