It's called a European Assignment Clause, and there's no indication anyone will use it. I worry about how it might impact starts if Shesterkin indicates he would consider using it, but otherwise, it's a collectively bargained tool for players to use to protect their interests.
well said
Just because they have an EAC doesn't mean they are going to exercise it at the first hint of adversity.
agree
-----
however, while no one should feel a need for immediate panic mode, this behooves us to do all we can to give the guys we want most the best opportunities to succeed. Translation: if a guy isn't cutting it like Poolparty in EDM, that's on him. But in the instant situation as applies to Rangers, it means creating enough minutes.
This means moving out not only deadwood [Smith] and entrenched vets [Staal] but excess [Namest.] for whatever works and even, if there is enuf on the table, for useful producers [Skjei, Strome, Buch] or even possibly potential guys [Lias, Howden].
That kills 2 birds with one stone.
Gets a necessary jump on preparing for expansion draft, 'cause it will not be as easy to make moves later on, AND
and it creates roster space for our emerging LDs, etc.