ESPN Ratings Hit 41 Year Low

its josh

Registered User
May 13, 2020
193
238
Strangely, I've watched more ESPN the last few months than I have the last 5+ years. The Last Dance, some of the Lance Armstrong special, the Long Gone Summer.
 

93LEAFS

Registered User
Nov 7, 2009
33,959
21,028
Toronto
Who the hell wants to watch sports-media primarily talk about non-sports things. I know outside of some of the documentaries (The Last Dance, etc) I have no interest in watching any sports media. I'd never watch First-Take in the first place, but hearing them talk about loosely related sports stories sounds even more insufferable than it was.
 

DaveG

Noted Jerk
Apr 7, 2003
51,185
48,489
Winston-Salem NC
Pretty sure the decline in ratings is because of the whole "no sports" thing, rather than the "they talk too much about politics", which people have been complaining about for forever.
Pretty much this. Can't say I've watched a second of ESPN outside of the Lance 30 for 30 since everything shut down. Like what's the f***ing point? I'm all for calling out ESPN when they get political. But this ain't it. I mean shit I'm amazed they even had 50k watching with literally no sports that are their properties going on currently.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Major4Boarding

Howboutthempanthers

Thread killer.
Sponsor
Sep 11, 2012
16,452
4,201
Brow. County, Fl.
I moved on from them as the leader in sports at the end of the 80s. And stopped watching all together when I lost interest in basketball towards the end of the 90s. I can't say I regret that decision. They seemed to have gone into a realm that I have no interest in.
Perhaps they need a new identity. I probably will never watch them again for more than an occasional look. But maybe they can build back up a larger audience.
 

Canes

Registered User
Oct 31, 2017
25,029
69,568
An Oblate Spheroid
Yet they're still going to keep increasing channel subscriber fees while putting more content behind their streaming services like ESPN+

Honestly it's one of the companies I'd love to see fail at this point
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveG

HisIceness

This is Hurricanes Hockey
Sep 16, 2010
40,370
70,874
Charlotte
Their general content sucks aside from 30 for 30. Live sporting events are fine but their talking head shows are just not that interesting. Case in point, SportsNation was supposed to cater to my age-range when it debuted in 2009 but I found the show to be more MTV/TMZ-like and less SportsCenter/PTI so I stopped watching it. But as time went on instead of keeping the news and information segmentsthat I liked, I got the impression that they enjoyed catering towards the TMZ side of things. And then suddenly their talent started developing TMZ-like personalities when they didn't before. And then their general content started revolving around about 5 things, namely LeBron, Lakers, Michael Jordan (who last played in 2003!), Tom Brady, and Aaron Rodgers. I don't know if SportsNation is/was the root cause of their downfall, but I started noticing the network was making a change for the worse around the time that idiotic show debuted.

They used to be something a sports fan couldn't live without, to something a sports fans might just glance at once in awhile. Such is life in the internet/smartphone era I guess but they are also their own worst enemy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveG

Mrfenn92

Proud to be American
Sponsor
Nov 27, 2018
30,655
29,957
Chicago,Illinois
Used to be must see watching for me. Love the 30 for 30 and the shorts they do.
Overall the death of Espn for me was when they went into yelling hot take shows back with bayless.
Didn't mind PTI, but adding around the horn and all the other clown car shows just sucked.

I'll watch actual sports on their
channels, nothing else more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrhockey193195

LeHab

Registered User
Aug 31, 2005
15,957
6,259
Strangely, I've watched more ESPN the last few months than I have the last 5+ years. The Last Dance, some of the Lance Armstrong special, the Long Gone Summer.

This historic low is for a single day - last week Wednesday:

On Wednesday ESPN’s studio programming, which has become MSESPN’s WokeCenter on steroids 24/7, hit a 41 year ratings low. That is, in the entire history of the network existing, it has never had lower overall studio ratings than it did this week.
 

DaveG

Noted Jerk
Apr 7, 2003
51,185
48,489
Winston-Salem NC
I don't know why they had to change what sportscenter was. It was the perfect show for sports fans. They had such a winning concept, and screwed it up.
they decided that fans wanted more TMZ style content for some reason. They decided to latch on to certain players to the point that it was completely nauseating and moved away from a highlights and analysis focus that they had been previously some time between when I started college (late 90s) and left college (2003). The focus on LeBron early in his career even back to his last year of high school was the canary in the coal mine and by the time Tebus became a star at Florida it was in full swing.
 

jprenkert

Registered User
Mar 7, 2014
656
337
Metro Detroit
I think in the last 10 year ive only ever watched ESPN was for 30 for 30 and for the last 5, I have just watched them off of Hulu, or ESPN+. Used to love the Sportscenters in the mid to late 90's when you could get info on everything going on. Would sit for hours during the summer watching it endlessly. Loved the trivia at the end of episodes and the personalities.
PTI was cool when it first came out but got stall, cold pizza was interesting at first also. But miss the coverage of all sports and not just names. I left when all you heard about was Yankees, Red Sox, Lakers, Lebron, Hot NFL team/topic. Don't miss it and when I have see a clip from current Sportcenters, it really sucks.
 

Long Live Lyle

Registered User
Feb 10, 2019
1,694
2,038
Chicago, IL
I don't know why they had to change what sportscenter was. It was the perfect show for sports fans. They had such a winning concept, and screwed it up.

Part of the issue is changing media. In the 90s/early 2000s, you pretty much had to go to SportsCenter for highlights. Now you don't. You go to the websites/apps of the respective teams/leagues you're interested in. ESPN correctly realized they had to change the model a bit. I do think SVP's SC is a pretty good example of how it can be done; it's less about highlights, but still has interesting content, interviews and occasional analysis. ESPN's problem is the "occasional" in that preceding sentence. Overall, there are too many "hot takes" and not good, objective analysis on too many of the shows. Semi-relatedly, the network talks about the same stuff OVER AND OVER AND OVER. I mean, how many times do you need to debate LeBron vs. MJ? How many times do you need to talk about the Dallas Cowboys? It gets stale. I think Stephen A. is funny. It's low-hanging fruit humor, but it makes me laugh. But I don't need/choose to waste my time watching ESPN for the best 30-second clip of his schtick that day, I can just find it on Twitter/YouTube later.

It's hard to know exactly where the blame should be most placed. There are some things outside of ESPN's control (e.g., the rise of the Internet as a general trend, Coronavirus as a specific incident, etc.). But they certainly don't help themselves, either.
 

Breakers

Make Mirrored Visors Legal Again
Aug 5, 2014
21,500
19,904
Denver Colorado
They SUCK at producing content
EZtHlBlXkAEld7l
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad