Kirk Van Houten
Registered User
- May 7, 2019
- 1,181
- 1,364
ESPN, Fox, WBD, to launch joint sports streaming service
- Thread starter Kirk Van Houten
- Start date
Fish on The Sand
Untouchable
I think this is because they can't offer a better product than linear TV does.
In the case of Sportsnet though, the app is just a tremendous piece of shit. If that app was somebody's first experience with streaming apps they'd never try any other app.
awfulwaffle
Registered User
brentashton
Registered User
- Jan 21, 2018
- 13,347
- 18,809
TSN isn’t far off neither .
it’s pretty sad in this day and age that the two largest Telcomconglomerates in Canada produced such horrible streaming platforms for their signature sport properties. Again, “oligopolies“ in Canada show how bad they really can be. I wish we could get some good old fashioned competition.
CanadienShark
Registered User
- Dec 18, 2012
- 37,553
- 10,826
Your image says "with ads" so I'm assuming the poster you quoted doesn't have ads?
IU Hawks fan
They call me IU
Why would someone buy ESPN+ standalone with no ads? It's sports, there's going to be breaks for ads either way.
LadyStanley
Registered User
Streaming bundles: A new era has arrived
The next wave of streaming bundles could entail media companies teaming up instead of competing with each other.
Now Paramount and Peacock (Comcast) chatting.
LadyStanley
Registered User
Fox says price of new streaming sports bundle will be in 'higher ranges' of estimates
"The pricing is going to be in the higher ranges of what people have talked about," Fox CEO Lachlan Murdoch said of the sports streaming service Fox is launching with Disney's ESPN and Warner Bros. Discovery.
Pricing expected at "higher end" of speculated price ranges.
BKIslandersFan
F*** off
I smell monopoly.
Streaming bundles: A new era has arrived
The next wave of streaming bundles could entail media companies teaming up instead of competing with each other.finance.yahoo.com
Now Paramount and Peacock (Comcast) chatting.
LadyStanley
Registered User
Kirk Van Houten
Registered User
- May 7, 2019
- 1,181
- 1,364
More fuel for the fire... or bang for the buck?
Tell me how you guys read this one. I know what I want to see in it, and I think my biases are clouding my judgement.
Tell me how you guys read this one. I know what I want to see in it, and I think my biases are clouding my judgement.
ESPN digital platforms adding links to several regional sports networks
ESPN will now begin linking to three RSNs, enabling in-market fans to watch games on those networks' streaming platforms.
awfulannouncing.com
More fuel for the fire... or bang for the buck?
Tell me how you guys read this one. I know what I want to see in it, and I think my biases are clouding my judgement.
ESPN digital platforms adding links to several regional sports networks
ESPN will now begin linking to three RSNs, enabling in-market fans to watch games on those networks' streaming platforms.awfulannouncing.com
It's just a link to where the game is. You aren't getting the RSNs as part of ESPN+ or anything.
I’m on Fubo & Max to get Sportsnet Pittsburgh and TNT games. My wishful brain was hoping I could ditch both for the cheaper combo YouTube TV and ESPN+. But a re-read of the article says you have to be signed in to your provider. At the very least it sounds like I won't have to jump from app to app to watch games.
Yeah, this goes back about a year.
Loading…
www.cnbc.com
Think like Amazon's Prime Video, where you see stuff from max, Starz, Discovery+, etc. while scrolling through.
