Brunkmeister
Registered User
- Sep 4, 2021
- 1,798
- 766
Really funny anyone would think it would take Spurs to roll over for them to lose against City...
It's not about losing but about losing by a lot.Really funny anyone would think it would take Spurs to roll over for them to lose against City...
It's not about losing but about losing by a lot.
this is conceivably the funniest thing that could ever happenKlopp is 1 yellow away from a 1 match touch line ban. Would be quite a scene if he got one later today.
Could he sit in the Kop?
It would be actually kinda funny.
In England (in both the men’s and women’s games) a manager suspended from the touchline has to sit in the directors’ box during the match. If there is no seat available or no official directors’ box, they must take up a spot in the stand which is not near the technical area or near opposition supporters.
FA guidance on touchline suspensions states: “The individual cannot position themselves in or behind the area of the dugout, or any barrier adjacent to the touchline or goal line.”
tHE luCKiEst
There is nothing worse than Tyler tbhGot to say that listening to Peter Drury on Sky Sports is worse than Martin Tyler.
There is and his name is Peter Drury.There is nothing worse than Tyler tbh
It's not about losing but about losing by a lot.
Spurs have been in terrible form and have conceded 4 goals to Newcastle, 3 to Arsenal, 2 to Chelsea, and 3 to Liverpool in the last month. They haven't kept a clean sheet in 2 months.Literally nobody would be surprised since they're absolute dogshit. I could very well see a City win by 5-6 goals and all it would take is for Spurs to be on their normal standard.
How many matches did those have to play?man united: "how can you expect us to play against a title chaser with casemiro and jonny evans!!!"
chelsea in may 2014: "ivanovic and tomas kalas at anfield? no problem!"
TBH I haven't listenedto Drury this season but in the past he was amazingThere is and his name is Peter Drury.
1, which keen observers will note is also the quantity of Man U matches i'm referring to here. i am exclusively talking about the game yesterdayHow many matches did those have to play?
I’d rather have Ivanovic and Kalasman united: "how can you expect us to play against a title chaser with casemiro and jonny evans!!!"
chelsea in may 2014: "ivanovic and tomas kalas at anfield? no problem!"
oh me too, but i think the point of "one CB is playing out of position, and the other CB is a guy who in total played 2 top division games in his entire career (of which the game at Anfield was 1), and yet we won at anfield"I’d rather have Ivanovic and Kalas
Everyone will rightfully remember Gerrard falling down, but this was also the worst Brendan Rodgers manager performance of all time. Jose Mourinho just completely took his lunch money. The players never trusted him again after either which was one of the reasons the following season was so badoh me too, but i think the point of "one CB is playing out of position, and the other CB is a guy who in total played 2 top division games in his entire career (of which the game at Anfield was 1), and yet we won at anfield"
Which was the second game in the row with Evans and Casemiro as CBs. Only once has United had worse situation, which was under SAF. Carrick and Darren Fletcher played as CBs at Fulham and United lost 0-3. But it was only one, IIRC there were suspensions also.1, which keen observers will note is also the quantity of Man U matches i'm referring to here. i am exclusively talking about the game yesterday
that's cool dude, i don't care about the amount of consecutive games, given that i'm just talking about how casemiro and evans sucked immense amounts of ass against Arsenal and "we have an inconvenient CB duo" should not absolve them of thatWhich was the second game in the row with Evans and Casemiro as CBs. Only once has United had worse situation, which was under SAF. Carrick and Darren Fletcher played as CBs at Fulham and United lost 0-3. But it was only one, IIRC there were suspensions also.