Confirmed with Link: [EDM/FLA] Purcell for FLA 3rd '16

Bring Back Bucky

Registered User
May 19, 2004
10,070
3,241
Canadas Ocean Playground
Bang on.

I couldn't care less if he wins four Norris Trophies in Pittsburg. It was NOT going to work out here. It was like when Leclair went to Philly. He could have played ten more years with the Habs and never exploded like he did with Lindros.

Good stockpiling of assets.
 

Bryanbryoil

Pray For Ukraine
Sep 13, 2004
86,206
34,679
If it's a 2017 3rd then they should be adding something else to it whether it's a 5th or 6th IMO.
 

Aerchon

Registered User
Jul 20, 2011
10,527
3,728
Kinda sucks imo.

Purcell had a strong year and big picture isn't significantly worse than a Hudler.

This is a situation, ironically enough where waiting till deadline would have improved his value.

However a third isn't bad and while slightly below value it's nice to know we got something for him.

I've always thought Purcell was an excellent support winger. His price tag is just too high tho and we need more physical guys.

Purcell is a significant upgrade on guys like Gagner and Yak but not good enough to spend serious money term on.
 

Bryanbryoil

Pray For Ukraine
Sep 13, 2004
86,206
34,679
Kinda sucks imo.

Purcell had a strong year and big picture isn't significantly worse than a Hudler.

This is a situation, ironically enough where waiting till deadline would have improved his value.

However a third isn't bad and while slightly below value it's nice to know we got something for him.

I've always thought Purcell was an excellent support winger. His price tag is just too high tho and we need more physical guys.

Purcell is a significant upgrade on guys like Gagner and Yak but not good enough to spend serious money term on.

Purcell has been playing **** hockey for the last 20ish games. Hudler led the Flames in scoring last season IIRC. I never felt that Purcell was = Hudler.
 

SupremeTeam16

5-14-6-1
May 31, 2013
8,177
7,384
Baker’s Bay
Hey remember that guy on this boards who said we would get a 4th/5th for Purcell.

Turns out he's just as dumb as the rest of us when it comes to this stuff, except he makes himself look like a fool parading his opinion around as fact.
 

Jumptheshark

Rebooting myself
Oct 12, 2003
99,867
13,850
Somewhere on Uranus
Hey remember that guy on this boards who said we would get a 4th/5th for Purcell.

Turns out he's just as dumb as the rest of us when it comes to this stuff, except he makes himself look like a fool parading his opinion around as fact.

and those who said we would get atleast a 2nd? they paraded the same way and how many posters are curruently pissed that all we got was the third

how many times did I say we wont get a 2nd for him? did we get a 2nd nope we got what will end up being the third or fourth last pick of the 3rd round--my prediction was closer then nearly everyone elses-- 4th round starts at 91--the pick we got for Purcell will be about 88-- OH MY ****ING GOD I WAS WRONG BY THREE SPOTS

still aint a 2nd--like I said--we were not getting a 2nd for purcell
 

nabob

Big Daddy Kane
Aug 3, 2005
34,516
21,093
HF boards
Purcell has been playing **** hockey for the last 20ish games. Hudler led the Flames in scoring last season IIRC. I never felt that Purcell was = Hudler.

2013-14 Calgary Flames NHL 75 17 37 54 16 4 -- -- -- -- --
2014-15 Calgary Flames NHL 78 31 45 76 14 17 11 4 4 8 2
2015-16 Calgary Flames NHL 53 10 25 35 17 -1


2013-14 Tampa Bay Light NHL 81 12 30 42 14 -3 4 1 0 1 0
2014-15 Edmonton Oilers NHL 82 12 22 34 24 -33 -- -- -- -- --
2015-16 Edmonton Oilers NHL 61 11 21 32 10 -9


not even close, keep in mind that this season Purcell has played 8 more games and has played all year with either McDavid or Hall + Drai.

Hudler is significantly better than Purcell in every way.
 

SupremeTeam16

5-14-6-1
May 31, 2013
8,177
7,384
Baker’s Bay
and those who said we would get atleast a 2nd? they paraded the same way and how many posters are curruently pissed that all we got was the third

how many times did I say we wont get a 2nd for him? did we get a 2nd nope we got what will end up being the third or fourth last pick of the 3rd round--my prediction was closer then nearly everyone elses-- 4th round starts at 91--the pick we got for Purcell will be about 88-- OH MY ****ING GOD I WAS WRONG BY THREE SPOTS

still aint a 2nd--like I said--we were not getting a 2nd for purcell


You're just as wrong as the people who said we would get a 2nd. Probably more wrong cause you said 4th/5th so you we're anticipating that pick to be in the 110+ range. And I thought a 2nd was always a long shot, I thought the best we would do was a 3rd and a middling prospect so I was wrong too.

And personally I don't think the Panthers will make it to the Eastern finals, I'm guessing that pick is in the 80-84 range
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad