Confirmed with Link: [EDM/CGY] James Neal <--> Milan Lucic ($750K Ret.) + Cond. 3rd '20 (Goals Scored Related vs. Looch)

Would You Have Pulled The Trigger On This Deal? (Neal for Lucic, 750k ret., cond 3rd)


  • Total voters
    334
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

McFlyingV

Registered User
Feb 22, 2013
22,871
13,585
Edmonton, Alberta
If the Oilers do buyout Neal next summer... it's another $1.9 million of cap space taken up for 7 years... and add to that the $750,00 on the books for Lucic's retained salary for 3 more years after next summer) as well.

The total cap savings over 7 years would be about $2.2 million buying out Neal next summer rather than just buying out Lucic next summer. Modest difference.
6 years not 7, and 3.35M cap saving for the first 3 years which ultimately is the most crucial time while McDavid and Drai are still under contract.
 

joestevens29

Registered User
Apr 30, 2009
52,905
15,707
I'm probably one of the biggest lucic fans on here. I loved what he was able to do before Edmonton. I believe his teammates loved to have him and I think he still can play a decent role on the NHL

With that being said he's overpriced by 3-4 mil on his current contract. And that nmc is brutal.

You can't just bank on him waiving it for expansion. And for that reason alone I love this trade
 
  • Like
Reactions: MessierII

Del Preston

Registered User
Mar 8, 2013
63,171
78,954
There's no reason to buy out James Neal anyway. I bet there's a few teams that would be interested in him at 50% ($2.875M/season) if it ever got to that point. And he wouldn't have a say in where he would be traded to.

I hope the days of the Oilers giving out NMCs like candy are over. The last idiot who ran the team never realized those clauses should be used as a negotiating tactic to get the salary down.
 

nexttothemoon

and again...
Jan 30, 2010
29,624
16,932
Northern AB
How is QoT measured though? I'm sure it's based off advanced stats like CF%, when in reality that stat shows McDavid as a worse player than a lot of 3rd liners. I think the truly incredible stat to look at is Lucic's abysmal goal and point production the past two seasons while playing significant minutes with all of McDavid, Drai, and Nuge, while also getting significant top unit PP time, and at worst 2nd PP time. The only season that Neal has seen Lucic like production was when he was playing almost exclusively 3rd line with 30 point line mates, and 2nd PP time.

In fact, the only season Lucic ever produced anything in Edmonton was a complete anomaly season where he scored 50% of his points and goals on the PP as a guy who has never been a good PP producer. All while spending most of the year stapled to McDavid and Draisaitl.

I personally never look at corsi or fenwick or shot stats... when they start awarding wins based on fenwick or corsi or shots... I'll pay attention to them. Until then I always use GF and GA based stats because that's what they actually count on the scoreboard.

Saying that one of the better stats is TOI% QOT as it's more highly correlated with GF%. It seems coaches like using the better players on the roster more often on the ice if possible. :)
 

CantHaveTkachev

Legends
Nov 30, 2004
50,126
30,364
St. OILbert, AB
People think Neal’s contract is buyout proof? It’s 3.8 saved for 4 years and 1.9 saved for the next 4. Lucic’s buyout savings only exceed 2M the first year and becomes around and less than 1M for the next 7. Neal is 1000x more buyoutable than Lucic.
if the Flames buy-out Lucic next summer, they save 500k in 2020-21, 2 mil 2021-22 then 500k in 2022-23
if the Oilers buy-out Neal next year, they save 3.8 mil the next 3 seasons

the buy-outs aren't even close
 

joestevens29

Registered User
Apr 30, 2009
52,905
15,707
If the Oilers do buyout Neal next summer... it's another $1.9 million of cap space taken up for 7 years... and add to that the $750,00 on the books for Lucic's retained salary for 3 more years after next summer) as well.

The total cap savings over 7 years would be about $2.2 million buying out Neal next summer rather than just buying out Lucic next summer. Modest difference.
The thing is lucic doesn't work here. Why not try someone else out before worrying about buy outs?
 

McVirginOil

Registered User
Jun 30, 2014
3,078
1,751
I personally never look at corsi or fenwick or shot stats... when they start awarding wins based on fenwick or corsi or shots... I'll pay attention to them. Until then I always use GF and GA based stats because that's what they actually count on the scoreboard.

Saying that one of the better stats is TOI% QOT as it's more highly correlated with GF%. It seems coaches like using the better players on the roster more often on the ice if possible. :)
There are win-stats but so far they’re all sort of modeled differently and it’s not as centralized as, say, baseball (but probably will be in the future!)

It’s called GAR or WAR (goals or wins above replacement) I recommend you check it out! It’s neat
 

Gordian Knot

Registered User
Jul 3, 2016
1,172
1,385
Question for those who know better but what if Lucic doesn’t play until his contract is finished and retires? How that affects our cap situation, doesn’t it punish us for front loaded contract?

I like the trade anyway and it gives kind of new start for whole team.
 

McFlyingV

Registered User
Feb 22, 2013
22,871
13,585
Edmonton, Alberta
I personally never look at corsi or fenwick or shot stats... when they start awarding wins based on fenwick or corsi or shots... I'll pay attention to them. Until then I always use GF and GA based stats because that's what they actually count on the scoreboard.

Saying that one of the better stats is TOI% QOT as it's more highly correlated with GF%. It seems coaches like using the better players on the roster more often on the ice if possible. :)
Oh it's TOI QOT that you're using.

Either way, my point still stands that Lucic outside of an anomaly PP driven season has produced at a 3rd or 4th line level his entire time in Edmonton despite spending the majority of his minutes with some combination of McDavid, Draisaitl, and Nuge. Neal on the other hand has at least been a contributing player in 2 of the last 3 seasons, and the only season he wasn't was when he was saddled to the 3rd line.
 

nexttothemoon

and again...
Jan 30, 2010
29,624
16,932
Northern AB
6 years not 7, and 3.35M cap saving for the first 3 years which ultimately is the most crucial time while McDavid and Drai are still under contract.

Yep you are right... 6 years... made a mistake when I said 7 years.

So it would have been a $16.5 million buyout for Lucic next summer.

Next summer the total for a Neal buyout + the Lucic retention money will be $13.75 million.

So $2.75 million total cap savings over that 6 year period... ~$458,000 per year on average.
 
Last edited:

McFlyingV

Registered User
Feb 22, 2013
22,871
13,585
Edmonton, Alberta
Yep you are right... 6 years... made a mistake when I said 7 years.

So it would have been a $16.5 million buyout for Lucic next summer.

Next summer the total for a Neal buyout + the Lucic retention money will be $13.75 million.

So $2.75 million total cap savings over that 6 year period... ~$458,00 per year on average.
It's really the short term relief in 2020-21, 21-22, and 22-23 that the value lies. The Oilers need to improve in the next 4 seasons and a Neal buyout would give them much more cap relief than a Lucic buyout. As was also mentioned, if Neal bounces back you could always look at a suitor in a trade with retention.

For example, a Neal buyout gives us ~3.35M cap space in '20-21, 21-22, and 22-23 seasons. A Lucic buyout would have given us 1.2M, 2.5M, and 1.2M cap space in those seasons.
 

Senor Catface

Registered User
Jul 25, 2006
16,039
20,100
People think Neal’s contract is buyout proof? It’s 3.8 saved for 4 years and 1.9 saved for the next 4. Lucic’s buyout savings only exceed 2M the first year and becomes around and less than 1M for the next 7. Neal is 1000x more buyoutable than Lucic.

“Person” not people
 
  • Like
Reactions: joestevens29

duul

Registered User
Jun 21, 2010
10,462
5,083
I'd to say that James Neal from my experience is an incredibly nice and laid back guy. Funny as hell. Back in 2014 I went to my buddy's brothers house and he was hanging out with James Neal and Derek Roy. They grew up together (Roy and my friends brother) playing hockey.

Anyway, we spent the night having a few beers and playing mini sticks before going out. Absolutely hilarious guys to be around and it's no surprise guys like McDavid have already taken a liking to him. I imagine he would be a very hard guy to dislike as a person.

Hopefully he can put er together a bit this year and pot 40 for us. The real deal.
 

Skolman

Registered User
Feb 16, 2018
9,498
8,089
On his 6th team despite scoring on a regular pace in this league.
Way to completely dismiss the point, can't answer it can you?

You clearly have absolutely no idea how this league works.

Guess what? It's a business.
Dallas traded him early in his career, it happens.
Nashville traded a very solid player for him.
Vegas claimed him in the expansion draft.
Calgary paid big money for him, which Vegas couldn't match.

Again, why are teams trading solid players, paying him big money, and strapping an "A" on his chest?

Please answer that.

I'm surprised I'm wasting my time with you, but I'll play.
 

MessierII

Registered User
Aug 10, 2011
27,818
16,476
Question for those who know better but what if Lucic doesn’t play until his contract is finished and retires? How that affects our cap situation, doesn’t it punish us for front loaded contract?

I like the trade anyway and it gives kind of new start for whole team.
There’s no cap recapture. If Lucic retired Calgary would gain 5.25 mil in cap space nothing else would happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordian Knot

nexttothemoon

and again...
Jan 30, 2010
29,624
16,932
Northern AB
The thing is lucic doesn't work here. Why not try someone else out before worrying about buy outs?

Yep, that's fair... my point being that you have a player coming in that's an even bigger negative... and effectively hoping for an even bigger bounceback to get back to even.

He could do it... or they buyout Neal at a slight cap savings... which is a likely eventuality as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad