Gardiner got the penalty on the play....no jokes
For a little more clarity, here's the breakdown on power plays on a team win basis:
For Boston wins (Games 1, 2, 4):
For Toronto wins (Games 3, 5):[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Game Boston Toronto 1 3/6 0/3 2 2/4 1/4 4 0/0 0/1 Total 5/10 1/8
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Game Boston Toronto 3 0/1 1/1 5 1/6 1/1 Total 1/7 2/2
What does this tells us? It seems like when a team scores on the power play, chances are they win......shocking!
Also shows the discrepancy in power plays in the 2 games the Leafs have won compared to the 3 games the Bruins have won.
And Chara got nothingGardiner got the penalty on the play....no jokes
He deserved a penalty no doubt. No need for him to be a 3rd wheel in a 2 man dance.
No fighting majors were assesed on the play, Hyman just got jumped. Even if you want to give Gardiner something for trying to separate them, Chara came in and punched Jake in the head in front of everyone and got nothing.
None of it makes sense.
Except numbers don't do it justice
10 penalties = 10 penalties is not fair officiating
and even the 17 - 10 comparison alone isn't enough to give you a clear image, you would have to watch the games.
The correct calls being made consistently should be the judge of fair officiating. The amount of crap the B's get away with is absolutely insane, the leafs get called for penalties on the exact same play. When Boston does it, it's just a good physical hockey play. If those plays are going to be called interference/hooking, Boston should've been called for about 5 of them tonight alone.
Consistency is all we ask for, if it's a penalty for one team, the same rule should apply for the other team.
Also is Nash 1 playing with straw sticks ? Those things are falling apart if someone coughs on them
Then it should be called in every multi player scrum. That would get awfully silly in a hurry.He deserved a penalty no doubt. No need for him to be a 3rd wheel in a 2 man dance.