K1984
Registered User
- Feb 7, 2008
- 13,738
- 13,090
I think a legit criticism of the Cambpell signing is that they locked in a goalie long term while possibly having a cheap starter in Skinner sitting there ready to take that spot. Could've had an extra 2 million if you went with a goalie of lower pedigree to split with Skinner. Obviously a gigantic risk, because if Skinner is terrible you've blown a season at least, but a huge potential payoff. I get why they went with Campbell, but it's going to get real dicey around here if Skinner outplays him this season.
If you look at emerging goalies, Skinner's stats are right there at the top. I agree with you, he's a legit potential number one.
As long as Campbell performs it won't be an obstacle getting rid of his deal if we have to. The 10 team no trade list is a bit of an obstacle, but the demand for goalies is much higher than supply so if he's posting a .910 sv% + that deal will be acceptable for any team that needs goaltending.