anezthes
Registered User
- Mar 20, 2014
- 4,464
- 2,507
Hopefully he does his 9 and then back to the SHL
I'm gonna hope for 30 points in 9 games instead.
I was pulling for Halttunen to be our first 2nd round pick.
Same.
Hopefully he does his 9 and then back to the SHL
I was pulling for Halttunen to be our first 2nd round pick.
Found this explanation in an article.According to Capfriendly, his ELC includes a European Assignment Clause. I'm not entirely sure what it means but I think it allows him to start the season in the NHL and then move to SHL
View attachment 728556
Ultimately, if there was an option on the table to trade down with CBJ, from a fans perspective Verbeek went with the least satisfying option. Ranking from best case to worst:
1. We get Carlsson + additional asset. Best case scenario for our organization with the team getting the player they rated highest with a free bonus, likely another draft pick or picks. As a fan, I would be satisfied with that outcome knowing we got who we wanted plus added value for taking non consensus pick.
2. We get Fantilli + additional asset. As a fan, we would be happiest picking the consensus best player, a guy who brings more intensity, speed, and bite. Organizationally, we would be happy since it sounds like they were extremely close in ratings, with the scouts favoring hockey sense and playmaking, and Verbeek preferring Leo developing another year in the SHL extend the tank another year and avoiding potentially stunting the prospects development.
3. Worst case for Duck fans who believe in consensus rankings and fearing we past on the better player, and maybe another Tkachuk-type impact player. We won’t know if the best option could have happened if we had a skilled negotiator or seasoned GM capable in reading or getting insights to who CBJ were planning on taking, or even get that information outright. Because this is the result we will always go back to what-ifs especially if Leo doesn’t live up to expectations, which are now higher since we passed on the consensus pick.
You should stop hanging around with such a "one track mind" crowd.Typical soft Verbeek signing? Asking for a friend.
I mean, both GM’s wanted Leo. Jarmo was looking to switch with Anaheim and add an asset, Verbeek said no, because he wanted to make sure he could secure Leo.
Plus, Fantilli preferred to be drafted by Columbus. So I think everything was meant to be.
If people are going to throw Leo under the bus just because he was not the so called consensus 2ndOA, I don't know what to say.
I hope that was the case and makes the pick better from a fans point of view. CBJ GM looks like a straight shooter from the video. He straight up said Bedard was #1, and they had Fantilli at #2 by a hair. So it sounds like we could have received an asset, but who knows… they could have gone with Leo at the last moment.I mean, both GM’s wanted Leo. Jarmo was looking to switch with Anaheim and add an asset, Verbeek said no, because he wanted to make sure he could secure Leo.
Plus, Fantilli preferred to be drafted by Columbus. So I think everything was meant to be.
If people are going to throw Leo under the bus just because he was not the so called consensus 2ndOA, I don't know what to say.
If he gets 9 games I doubt he ever gets sent down. He is such a good complimentary player that I think he will be extremely successful even if his game needs a little seasoning. Elite transition stats and puck possession will make whatever line he is on way better.
I thought the nhl had an agreement with the SHL that didn’t allow them to move players back and forth between leagues during the year. As in if he plays in the nhl his only option would be the ahl if they wanted to send him down.
Not sure about that... with our misses on forwards I wouldn't have mind another dart at a big forwards like Wahlberg or Nelson, or added more big dmen like Strbak or Dvorak...At the end of the day I dont really care that much about the 2nd asset. Id rather just go with who our scouts wanted. A 2nd round pick is unlikely to make up the value difference in the long run of 2 vs 3 so just pick who you think is best.
I really don’t want to re-hash the Carlsson-Fantilli debate, and I wanted Fantilli.
No one will ever convince me that the Ducks was Fantilli’s preferred choice. And there is no way to judge his reaction if Verbeek wanted to bring him along slowly. Even more if he went back to Michigan.
I’d rather have a signed Carlsson than an unsigned Fantilli regardless of any consensus.
John