Unless this is purely on Zegras and it's all he will accept, I think this is a big mistake.
Maybe I have more faith in him than others but I'd try to get the Hughes 8x8 right now.
Stuztle, Hughes, Thompson, Hintz, Boldy, etc etc. All look like they early long-term extension was the right call.
If NJD waited another year on Hughes they'd probably be paying 11 x 8 right now.I’m fine with a bridge deal, don’t understand why people are so into rushing a 8x8 deal or whatever long term contracts others are signing these days
Unless this is purely on Zegras and it's all he will accept, I think this is a big mistake.
Maybe I have more faith in him than others but I'd try to get the Hughes 8x8 right now.
Stuztle, Hughes, Thompson, Hintz, Boldy, etc etc. All look like they early long-term extension was the right call.
I mean "early" as in immediately after they started showing their quality rather than waiting for some more "prove it again" years, not necessarily "early" as in the first 2-3 years of their career.thompson was not an ELC after signing a 3 year low bridge. Broke out in yr 3 of thst and thrn got signed to $7M deal thst starts this season.
if all for as a gm to sign ELC teenagers to a bridge thrn 7+ yr contract taking them to after 30 yrs old.
thr big risk contracts are having to sign 27-29 yr olds to high long contracts taking thrm to 35+ and the return isn’t there.
You lock that kid long term.
A bridge is a HUGE L for a rebuilding team like Anaheim. Only kind of team that should bridge young talented players like Zegras are contending team that try to lower the AAV while they contend (ex: Edmonton for Bouchard, Tampa with Point a few years ago).
Montreal and Minnesota locked Caufield and Boldy long term. No reason Anaheim should not do the same for Zegras.
I'd give 8.5*8y to Zegras and not lose sleep one bit over that contract.The issue is, his camp may be asking for a bridge. Verbeek I am sure would love to lock him down to a Boldy or even Hughes type contract.
I think this is why nothing has been signed yet.
My guess is zegras wants a bridge…. He is the type to bet on himself…. And he could prob get 8x8 long term.You lock that kid long term.
A bridge is a HUGE L for a rebuilding team like Anaheim. Only kind of team that should bridge young talented players like Zegras are contending team that try to lower the AAV while they contend (ex: Edmonton for Bouchard, Tampa with Point a few years ago).
Montreal and Minnesota locked Caufield and Boldy long term. No reason Anaheim should not do the same for Zegras.
If Zegras signs a long term deal now, would probably be around 7 million per year, similar to what Boldy signed, don’t see it being more than him or Terry for that matter.
He signs a bridge for 6.5-7 million for 3 years, then can sign a long term contract between 8 and 9 million, perhaps more, if he truly reaches his potential and hits PPG+ level. So he is betting on himself.
My guess is zegras wants a bridge…. He is the type to bet on himself…. And he could prob get 8x8 long term.
I imagine he gets 3 x 6.5, and prob looking at 10+ on his next deal.
When the team around him is better his stats are going to increase, and when we run a decent nhl system…. His defensive flaws won’t be noticed as much max.
My guess is his long term ask was 9+
He will force his way to him to a team he was a fan as a kid. I'll just leave it at that. Get this done Drury
That's true but I don't think this is the reason at all. This is nothing like the Matthews deal because Matthews is at least an established top elite. In Zegras' situation, he's only established enough to make perhaps 7.0 x 8 years.The cap is going up. Even if he just puts up 70 points the next 2 seasons, he'll get a lot more money taking a bridge here and then signing a new deal.
The rangers will acquire him 14 years from nowHe will force his way to him to a team he was a fan as a kid. I'll just leave it at that. Get this done Drury