Soundgarden
#164303
like who? a Byfield level guy? Forsberg isnt getting that.
value wise, between Amirov/Robertson/1st it could get done.
Someone like Lundell or Jarvis. Yes, we know that those guys are good that's what it'd take.
like who? a Byfield level guy? Forsberg isnt getting that.
value wise, between Amirov/Robertson/1st it could get done.
Forsberg plays better D than Nylander. He also goes into the corners and digs for the puck.
Forsberg has more than twice the goals against than Nylander this season, and is a -7 while Nylander is +9.
He's not better defensively, certainly not currently.
like who? a Byfield level guy? Forsberg isnt getting that.
value wise, between Amirov/Robertson/1st it could get done.
Lol, that's a horrible metric considering Nashville is closer to Buffalo and Ottawa than it is to Toronto.
He’s also 28 and Nylander is 24. They are close now and my guess is Nylander will be twice the player jt Miller is age 25, 26, 27, 28 etc. don’t believe me? Look at Jt Miller’s age 23-24 seasons and compare to NylanderI already explained it.
JT Miller is better than Nylander in basically every part of hockey, he gets more points, he hits more, he plays multiple positions, his cap is cheaper.
You put everything together, and he is twice the player.
Miller is not perfect tho, I will say, He makes dumb passes, and turnovers from time to time, but overall, the guy is a damn good hockey player.
Were done here, going in circles.
So basically if you ignore Forsberg's proven strong 2-way game from previous years when Nashville was competitive then Forsberg is as bad as Nylander defensively? This is like when people said Mark Stone was an average player before he was traded from Ottawa.Each guy also gets majority offensive zone starts. The state of the Predators certainly doesn't help Flips numbers, but there's not much supporting the earlier claim that Nylander is worse defensively. At least now or moving forwards
So basically if you ignore Forsberg's proven strong 2-way game from previous years when Nashville was competitive then Forsberg is as bad as Nylander defensively? This is like when people said Mark Stone was an average player before he was traded from Ottawa.
That's actually the best argument so far, The age thing does matter.He’s also 28 and Nylander is 24. They are close now and my guess is Nylander will be twice the player jt Miller is age 25, 26, 27, 28 etc. don’t believe me? Look at Jt Miller’s age 23-24 seasons and compare to Nylander
Do the Leafs need defensive D-men, or two-way forwards? If my Canucks are out, any of Hamonic/ Pearson/ Sutter can be yours for center prospect (and add picks on top if acquiring multiple players);
e.g.
how is Hallander looking? Heard he has a good two-way and playmaking game.
Sandin (if available) would be nice too as a LD replacement for Edler (could be had if he wants out)
Also been browsing around and would be open to the return to include guys like Villeneuve and Rasanen (6'6" right shot D, who's a 2nd round pick? Sign me up)
-leafs aren't exactly looking for defenseman. But it depends. A player like ekholm could be added it seems. Aka a high end #2. Leafs current d core is solid. They have 4 top 4 dman. So if we add we essentially push a top 4 dman to the bottom pairing.Do the Leafs need defensive D-men, or two-way forwards? If my Canucks are out, any of Hamonic/ Pearson/ Sutter can be yours for center prospect (and add picks on top if acquiring multiple players);
e.g.
how is Hallander looking? Heard he has a good two-way and playmaking game.
Sandin (if available) would be nice too as a LD replacement for Edler (could be had if he wants out)
Also been browsing around and would be open to the return to include guys like Villeneuve and Rasanen (6'6" right shot D, who's a 2nd round pick? Sign me up)
-leafs aren't exactly looking for defenseman. But it depends. A player like ekholm could be added it seems. Aka a high end #2. Leafs current d core is solid. They have 4 top 4 dman. So if we add we essentially push a top 4 dman to the bottom pairing.
-leafs need a top 6 lw. Leafs might need a 3c but it depends. Top 6 lw is the biggest need. 3c is an iffy want imo. Engvall has really emerged for the leafs.
- From the Canucks i guess Pearson is an expiring lw we would be interested. But he screens middle 6 player which im not sure about. Leafs really want a bonifde top 6 lw IMHO.
Leafs have several guys who could minute munch(rielly, muzzin, holl, brodie). Even the aforementioned Bogosian.If you guys need more minute munchers on D (for reference the Lightning had 3-4 major minute guys in Hedman, Sergachev, McDonagh and Cernak last year along with the likes of Coburn, Bogosian, Schenn and Rutta), Hamonic is pretty good.
Pearson would also come cheaper than other top 6 LWs like Hall, and he's fit really well next to Horvat in a top-6 shutdown role. He's gritty, gives good effort and smart (ask Colin White), and he'd fit in well next to skill. For either of them though I hope Hallander is the main piece coming back.
That's only 2 top prospects they haveBetter not be Sandin or Robertson...!!
Yeah, every team has a lot of prospects. But the top prospects rarely go more than 3 top prospects.That's only 2 top prospects they have
He plays right side correct? Not ideal for Leafs top 6. Guys like Foligno, Rakell, Granlund can play left side as well as right or centre even.What about Palmieri? Would leaf fans be interested in him?
Why would Vancouver do this though?WHy compare Nylander and Miller. I think Miller is slightly better, you may think Nylander is. Canucks wouldn't have interest in this trade, they would only trade Miller for a young d.
What about something around Miller for Sandin+?
We need young d badly.Why would Vancouver do this though?
Thinking it would take a lot more than Sandin for Miller. Miller's a great player with a good cap hit & term and a pretty perfect fit for them. If he were available Leafs should be all over that; Sandin's current place on their depth can be replaced in a separate deal. They have enough D prospects, & a strong left side that they'd be okay for the future there. I'd think he'd have at least as much trade value as Forsberg.We need young d badly.
yet that same argument is overlooked when attributing strong defensive play to Forsberg. Nsh played a strong D system which made players look better defensively than they are.Forsberg is a far better player than Nylander. So is Miller for that matter.
Toronto simply doesn't have the pieces Nashville would want for Forsberg, assuming he was made available.
Toronto is a better team than Nashville. Playing on a better team doesn't suddenly make every player on your roster Gretzky, or all players on a worse team worse than your 4th or 5th most talented guy.
Plus/minus is not a reliable stat for saying a player is better defensively.
The sky is blue. Don't poke the bear. Remember to breathe.