Dreger: "Shattenkirk is a 2nd pairing dman, 3rd pairing on some teams"

Status
Not open for further replies.

MNRube

Registered User
Oct 20, 2013
6,127
3,036
Probably meant a "3rd dman"

Or I hope so. I'm not a huge Shattenkirk guy but he's way better than that
 

Balthazar

I haven't talked to the trainers yet
Sponsor
Apr 25, 2006
49,981
53,427
Probably meant a "3rd dman"

Or I hope so. I'm not a huge Shattenkirk guy but he's way better than that

No, he clearly said 2nd or 3rd pairing guy... PP specialist.
 

MXD

Original #4
Oct 27, 2005
50,839
16,579
...Someone is trying to look smart.
Considering Dreger's age, he should know better.
 

Machinehead

GoAwayTrouba
Jan 21, 2011
144,133
117,334
NYC
He did say "some teams have him ranked..."

Not sure if this Dreger's opinion, or what he's heard from monkey GM's around the league.

Wouldn't be surprised at all if GM's think that. "MUHHH not tuff enuff doesn't play enuff shutz er down defernse"
 

LeafFever

Registered User
Feb 12, 2016
18,890
6,178
He was quoting some sources from other teams. He did not say it was his opinion.

The problem with a guy like Shattenkirk is, on a worse defence (And he definitely will be joining a worse defence), he might get exposed in a bigger role. And of course he'll be badly overpaid.
 

Bobby Orr's Knees

Registered User
Dec 17, 2002
2,050
461
Where it hurts most
Visit site
At this point I would give my right arm to get Shattenkirk on the Flyers. Would absolutely love to see him with Provorov. Shattenkirk is top-4 on any team, and he'd easily be a top pairing D for us. Don't know what Dreger is drinking...
 

Machinehead

GoAwayTrouba
Jan 21, 2011
144,133
117,334
NYC
He says he's a 2nd pairing defenseman, and some teams have him ranked as 3rd pairing.

He plays 2nd pair minutes on St. Louis and he literally could not possibly be joining a better right side than St. Louis.

So, some teams are stupid.
 

rhinoshawarma

Registered User
Nov 15, 2014
2,622
314
Blasphemous!!

Edit: He didn't say he was a 2nd or 3rd pairing D but some teams consider him that.
 
Last edited:

Nalens Oga

Registered User
Jan 5, 2010
16,780
1,054
Canada
Dreger is an insider who spends more time on his phone and twitter than watching actual hockey. The info these guys get is often hearsay nor is their job to actually analyze or evaluate players.

I don't know why you guys take them so seriously. I also find it funny how highly-regarded Bob McKenzie's draft rankings are. Those are consensus rankings he gets from scouts on where he thinks players are going to go. Bob himself isn't exactly spending time watching a bunch of actual junior hockey and making scouting reports.
 

Knave

Registered User
Mar 6, 2007
21,652
2,238
Ottawa
Bob McKenzie basically said the same thing earlier on That's Hockey and yet only Dreger takes **** (and I loathe Dreger).
 

Battle Lin

Registered User
Dec 18, 2015
4,412
744
if shatty is on our 3rd pairing, then gawd dam you got the cup rapped up because thats an amazing defense
 

Knave

Registered User
Mar 6, 2007
21,652
2,238
Ottawa
if shatty is on our 3rd pairing, then gawd dam you got the cup rapped up because thats an amazing defense

If I remember what Bob said (didn't listen to Dreger) - it was implied Shatternkirk would sometimes get 3rd pairing 5 on 5 minutes. And the Leafs wouldn't want him because he couldn't be a top pairing guy for them.
 

LeafFever

Registered User
Feb 12, 2016
18,890
6,178
The irony of creating a thread about what Dreger said and the context is completely incorrect..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad