Draft Picks, the cold hard facts/stats

billybudd

Registered User
Feb 1, 2012
22,049
2,249
Hey, what about Letestu and Vitale?

Dustin Jeffrey was probably bound to be a legitimate NHL player if he hadn't been injured. He's still good enough to lead the Utica Comets in scoring!

I'd be interested in knowing what the heck went wrong with that knee, specifically. He wasn't a great skater to begin with, but most 23 year olds who hurt their knee don't come back looking like he did.
 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Registered User
Sep 5, 2008
28,726
2,346
In my opinion, picks are assets just like players. If you can move an asset to make your team better, you do it. Of course, picks are a bit tricky because there's a chance (an infinitesimal one) that you could snag a guy like Zetterberg later on in the rounds. But, again, the odds of even a 2nd rounder making it to the level of being an impact NHLer are pretty damn low. If you have a chance to move one of those picks for a player who is going to be an effective roster guy for your club, you do it. It's not about selling the farm for rentals, it's about packaging picks for guys like Perron who will be around for an extended period of time. Hell, I even like the Winnik trade. I'll love the trade if he re-signs here this summer. The odds of a 2nd rounder and 4th rounder turning into guys we develop into NHL players are tiny, and the odds of those guys helping us in the next 3 to 5 years is even smaller.

Picks are important with regard to their value as assets, but I think people can overrate them pretty often. The only picks you should really never trade are top-5 picks, especially in a year with bonafide stud players up for grabs (like a Crosby, Ovechkin, Malkin, Stamkos).
 

Mr Jiggyfly

Registered User
Jan 29, 2004
34,308
19,382
In my opinion, picks are assets just like players. If you can move an asset to make your team better, you do it. Of course, picks are a bit tricky because there's a chance (an infinitesimal one) that you could snag a guy like Zetterberg later on in the rounds. But, again, the odds of even a 2nd rounder making it to the level of being an impact NHLer are pretty damn low. If you have a chance to move one of those picks for a player who is going to be an effective roster guy for your club, you do it. It's not about selling the farm for rentals, it's about packaging picks for guys like Perron who will be around for an extended period of time. Hell, I even like the Winnik trade. I'll love the trade if he re-signs here this summer. The odds of a 2nd rounder and 4th rounder turning into guys we develop into NHL players are tiny, and the odds of those guys helping us in the next 3 to 5 years is even smaller.

Picks are important with regard to their value as assets, but I think people can overrate them pretty often. The only picks you should really never trade are top-5 picks, especially in a year with bonafide stud players up for grabs (like a Crosby, Ovechkin, Malkin, Stamkos).

Picks are nothing but currency given to each NHL team to manage their org rosters. Some are used to buy prospects, others are used to buy established players.

You only get in trouble when that currency buys you 3 months of service like 2013 and your org has nothing to show for it. Trading two firsts and two seconds for three months of a misused Iggy, as well as Murray and Morrow, is basically pissing your highest valued currency away.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad