He was right up there after the first period, didn't get as much after that.
I still find BB:s obsession with Vatanen weird though.
8:28 PPTOI. He was 5th in ESTOI, ahead of only Fowler.
Yeah, that might work to get this team back on track - of losing?Not talking about just this game, but in general.
Healthy Fowler and Lindholm should have 3-4 more minutes than Vatanen every game. Not the other way around.
Okay, my first beef with the new NHL site is lack of an immidiate highlights and lack of all of the goals for the game. Step your game up MLB, I know you're used to slow like molasses sport but that's no excuse.
EDIT: I love how people on the main boards claim Ducks turnaround was inevitable because of corsi and/or fenwick. It shows two things: didn't watch Ducks, and confirmation bias.
Okay, my first beef with the new NHL site is lack of an immidiate highlights and lack of all of the goals for the game. Step your game up MLB, I know you're used to slow like molasses sport but that's no excuse.
EDIT: I love how people on the main boards claim Ducks turnaround was inevitable because of corsi and/or fenwick. It shows two things: didn't watch Ducks, and confirmation bias.
and those people were criticized on hf for saying it wouldn't last, and that the ducks underlying stats showed they would get better. they did, and it also caused boudreau to make a systemic change and as a result those possession metrics got even better, and Anaheim's horrible shooting % inevitably improved, and it also helps that they subtracted perimeter players, for more guys who are around the net with the teams high SAT%
This right here. Fancy stats were sexy in spite of play, not as a result of play on ice. Huge difference.Not really. They claimed that Anaheim was going to improve and that no changes were needed; that it was just bad luck. I saw no claims from that group that trades or a new system was needed. That's ignoring that just saying things will improve at some undefined point in the future isn't really a prediction, or at least a meaningful one.
The new highlight videos suck. They've limited the highlight compilations (recaps?) to just the goals and now there's some weird narrator guy too. As if we can't tell what's going on without that guy...
and those people were criticized on hf for saying it wouldn't last, and that the ducks underlying stats showed they would get better. they did, and it also caused boudreau to make a systemic change and as a result those possession metrics got even better, and Anaheim's horrible shooting % inevitably improved, and it also helps that they subtracted perimeter players, for more guys who are around the net with the teams high SAT%
Not talking about just this game, but in general.
Healthy Fowler and Lindholm should have 3-4 more minutes than Vatanen every game. Not the other way around.
Hampus has thrived under the workload he's been given. His turnaround from October-November (it is NOT just a function of the team playing better) is stunning. If slightly fewer minutes now are what it takes to help him continue to develop into a beast for later, no one should complain.Feels like Bruce is using Lindholm less when the team is winning. No need to amp his minutes then I guess. Hence the low rate of icetime recently. Although, he had 21+ this game. Only Vatanen with more. But Manson with most 5 on 5 followed by Dupres. Which also sort of follow that logic.
All thanks to Garbutt.