Signing(s): Dodgers sign Clayton Kershaw to 3 years/93 M deal

[Marc the Habs Fan]

Click to read more...

 

[John Price]

good deal

 

[MMC]

Surprised he didn’t want to test the market after two straight World Series losses. Rangers could be decent in a few years and could throw a ton of money at him.

 

[Say Hey Kid]

good deal

For Kershaw. Bad deal for the Dodgers.

 

[darko]

Can't believe he took a 3 year deal.

 

[darko]

Surprised he didn’t want to test the market after two straight World Series losses. Rangers could be decent in a few years and could throw a ton of money at him.

And he's from Dallas area.

 

[BKIslandersFan]

For Kershaw. Bad deal for the Dodgers.

Who cares, they can afford it.

 

[MMC]

And he's from Dallas area.

Yeah forgot to mention that

 

[rangerssharks414]

So, the 2 for $65M total was ripped up, and he's getting $93M total over 3 instead?

I'm surprised that he only got three years.

 

[darko]

So, the 2 for $65M total was ripped up, and he's getting $93M total over 3 instead?

I'm surprised that he only got three years.

Correct.

 

[Vamos Rafa]

Surprised he didn’t want to test the market after two straight World Series losses. Rangers could be decent in a few years and could throw a ton of money at him.

Or the franchise's commitment to winning is just attractive to players (both homegrown and free agents). Nobody mentions that the Dodgers have only had 2 losing seasons since 2000 and those two seasons were under Frank McBankrupt.