John Flyers Fan said:
well lets take a look individually at some of the teams mentioned and see if your argument holds up
Penguins - need a new areana period, or they can't survive, cap or no cap
Sens - a top 3 or 4 NHL team
Nucks - most profitable NHL team, can afford any free agent they want
Kings - big market team
Lightning - Stanley Cup Champs
Bruins - big market team
Thrashers - big market team
Flames - Stanley Cup finalist
Blackhawks - Big market team
Yotes - were spending freely this offseason
what does your list have to do with anything, they all need cost certainty
lets use your list
The Penguins would have Jagr, Kovy, Lemieux, Kasper, Boughner, Francis, Straka, Lang ect.... if they were able to compete and pay what big money teams could pay....attendence would not be a problem if they had all those players....while they do need a new arena to compete just 4 years ago the Pens made a profit with a 34 million dollar payroll
The Sens will lose all their talent once they become UFA's if the same system is in place
the Nucks were losing money just 5-8 years ago, wait until they have a downturn..and attendence drops, they will be in trouble again...esp. if the US dollar goes up
the Kings have been bleeding money, read the fan report.....it might be in a big markt but that is not a big market team
Lightning are losing less money this year with no hockey then if games were being played, whos side do you think they are on????????????
Flames- stanley cup runner up???? who cares, they still need cost certainty and are def. on Bettmans side
The Yotes spent because no big market teams were there to raise the prices of the players, it was a buyers market, same reason the Pens got Recchi and will sign a few players if a cap is agreed upon....
everyone of the teams you listed are on bettmans side....8 votes is all that is needed to say no thanks to any proposal
when the NHLPA makes a good enough deal for 23 teams to sign off on, then the lockout will be over but 24% means nothing to most of those teams