I'd say if a player has a strong case for being the greatest goal scorer to ever play the game then yes, said player is, "generational."
I'd say if a player has a strong case for being the greatest goal scorer to ever play the game then yes, said player is, "generational."
Even if Crosby doubles his achievement, he'll only be in the same position Ovechkin is in now (one season to tie the all-time leader).For those now turning this into Crosby Is Not Generational; similar to my last example of Ovechkin being in the elite goal scoring class of Richard, Hull, Esposito and Gretzky based on many years of leading the league in goals, here are the leaders for seasons leading the league in points-per-game.
Gretzky 11
Lemieux 7
Howe 7
Esposito 5
Crosby 5
Mikita and Bill Cowley have 4, others have 3. I think this is just as telling a stat as Ovechkin's times leading the league in goals.
Year | League | Award |
---|---|---|
2005-06 | NHL | Calder Memorial Trophy |
2007-08 | NHL | Art Ross Trophy |
2007-08 | NHL | Hart Memorial Trophy |
2007-08 | NHL | Maurice "Rocket" Richard Trophy |
2007-08 | NHL | Lester B. Pearson Trophy |
2008-09 | NHL | Hart Memorial Trophy |
2008-09 | NHL | Maurice "Rocket" Richard Trophy |
2008-09 | NHL | Ted Lindsay Award |
2009-10 | NHL | Ted Lindsay Award |
2012-13 | NHL | Hart Memorial Trophy |
2012-13 | NHL | Maurice "Rocket" Richard Trophy |
2013-14 | NHL | Maurice "Rocket" Richard Trophy |
2014-15 | NHL | Maurice "Rocket" Richard Trophy |
2015-16 | NHL | Maurice "Rocket" Richard Trophy |
Nope. Team success matters to me. The guy has never even been out of the second round.
So since entering the league Ovi has had more individual awards, most goals, most points (yes, him and Crosby came in same year and Ovi has more points), and some people don’t think he’s generational?
Yet Crosby, who is about to have his 7th out of last 8 seasons not even have 90 points in a given year is considered by some a top 3 or top 5 player.
This isn’t a knock on Crosby - he’s amazing and the best when healthy - but it just shows the biased views people have.
Durability (especially with Ovi’s past is important). Team success tharCrosby has is important too.
Crosby is the better player overall because people view team success as a big part of things - and that’s understandable. However, if you switched team success around and Ovi had multiple Cups who wouldn’t be saying he’s the best player by far of this generation?
We should just be enjoying what we are seeing. People were obsessed and saying McDavid and Matthews are the next best thing ever - and so far they aren’t anywhere near Ovi/Crosby prime levels... and that’s okay because OVI and Crosby are both EASILY generational talents.
Nope. Team success matters to me. The guy has never even been out of the second round.