Takeru
Registered User
- Oct 6, 2014
- 2,214
- 739
Before season started, most people said Habs were pretty much the same as last year.
We basically swapped Vanek/Gio for PAP/Sekac (this is an improvement since Gio was so bad, but none of the two we got is as dangerous as Vanek was LAST season).
There's also the Malhotra - Brière swap (both play on 4th line). I'd say this one is an improvement as well, considering Malhotra fills the duties of a 4th liner better, though Brière, despite his small TOI used to score the goal that made the difference.
Then there's the Gilbert - Gorges swap. Different players, small game sample to evaluate but so far I don't see this neither as a huge improvement nor a terrible downgrade.
So there you have it, our team has essentially the same potential as last year. Where it becomes interesting is when we look at the last season.
Here's my short summary of last season with what I'd call turning points:
1-Average start, then we get on a roll during Nov and get at least a point every game for 10 straight games.
2-Blow out 6-0 VS LAK, start struggling for a month or so despite some great moments (3rd period comeback VS Sens)
3-Gather a couple of wins before Olympic break.
4-Price is injured, having a hard time without him
5-Price is back, we get Vanek and end the season on a high note.
So yeah, I don't expect this year to be much different, we had our good sequence at the start and now we're in step 2 (funny how our struggles start with a loss to West Conf).
My point with all this is, we only saw a drastic improvement of performance after landing a high caliber player (Vanek) by paying the price (which fortunately was ''small'', prospect +pick)
What I mean to say is don't expect anything much different, you don't get huge improvements overnight (or summer in this case), you need to sacrifice something for it, whether it's roster players (good ones), prospects or picks, which MB hasn't seemed so eager to do in the past.
We basically swapped Vanek/Gio for PAP/Sekac (this is an improvement since Gio was so bad, but none of the two we got is as dangerous as Vanek was LAST season).
There's also the Malhotra - Brière swap (both play on 4th line). I'd say this one is an improvement as well, considering Malhotra fills the duties of a 4th liner better, though Brière, despite his small TOI used to score the goal that made the difference.
Then there's the Gilbert - Gorges swap. Different players, small game sample to evaluate but so far I don't see this neither as a huge improvement nor a terrible downgrade.
So there you have it, our team has essentially the same potential as last year. Where it becomes interesting is when we look at the last season.
Here's my short summary of last season with what I'd call turning points:
1-Average start, then we get on a roll during Nov and get at least a point every game for 10 straight games.
2-Blow out 6-0 VS LAK, start struggling for a month or so despite some great moments (3rd period comeback VS Sens)
3-Gather a couple of wins before Olympic break.
4-Price is injured, having a hard time without him
5-Price is back, we get Vanek and end the season on a high note.
So yeah, I don't expect this year to be much different, we had our good sequence at the start and now we're in step 2 (funny how our struggles start with a loss to West Conf).
My point with all this is, we only saw a drastic improvement of performance after landing a high caliber player (Vanek) by paying the price (which fortunately was ''small'', prospect +pick)
What I mean to say is don't expect anything much different, you don't get huge improvements overnight (or summer in this case), you need to sacrifice something for it, whether it's roster players (good ones), prospects or picks, which MB hasn't seemed so eager to do in the past.