ForeverJerseyGirl
Registered User
If it was 2008 our forward corps would look pretty good.
Once we discover the secret to time travel, we'll be contenders!
If it was 2008 our forward corps would look pretty good.
Another problem. If Severson and Santini don't turn out to be very, very good Dmen. Our dreams of a stacked D corps is dead, as the others playing in the NHL now are projecting to be not much more than average/journeymen D men.
What?
What's wrong with Larsson and Merrill? Other than Merrill having a sophomore slump.
Larsson is probably a lower end top pairing guy and Merrill probably a lower end top 4 guy. If one of the prospects don't come in and be genuine #1's, our group will be more solid than spectacular.
I just see Larsson's ceiling as a Dan Hamhuis, while Merrill might have a Seidenberg top end.
I just don't think either has shown any X-factor that should at least be visible at times by now. Just no real elite levels in any of the main skills.
I agree with that, but i think you can still be a contending team without a star on D, assuming you have no major weak points on D.
It's up front where you really need elite talent to succeed IMO. Hell, the Devils made it all the way to the finals in 2012 rolling out guys like Fayne, Harrold, Volch, Sal... No real elite talent there. But they had Zach and Kovy.
I used to scoff at the Marc-Andre Bergeron comparisons but I can't any more. This is a guy who just can't put it together. Not an every night player, at all.
Larsson is probably a lower end top pairing guy and Merrill probably a lower end top 4 guy. If one of the prospects don't come in and be genuine #1's, our group will be more solid than spectacular.
Of course you can do it without Elite D men. But our blue print seems to be a real league wide strength through defense. We need a Elite/Genuine #1 to be the back bone of that strength.
I just see Larsson's ceiling as a Dan Hamhuis, while Merrill might have a Seidenberg top end.
I just don't think either has shown any X-factor that should at least be visible at times by now. Just no real elite levels in any of the main skills.
I'd like to see that blueprint adjusted. I'd prefer to have a solid D with no elite players and a legitimate Elite 1st line center than an OK D with an Elite D man and a group of just solid forwards.
Why adjust it. One of our high end kids will be elite.
Because our opinions differ here. I see some top pairing guys here for sure, but nothing elite in the mold of Doughty or Weber IMO. And there is nothing wrong with that.
Only time will prove who is right here but I disagree. One of them will be elite imo.
NEW JERSEY DEVILS
CHICAGO BLACKHAWKS
*All exaggerations for comic effect. Dont get your panties in a bunch
I would add though that I'm not sure if it is possible to build solid top to bottom teams in a cap world anymore... LA has been able to do it rather successfully but they seem to be the exception... Boston was built that way and they have been having cap difficulties for the last couple of years.
Having 6 good forwards plus 4 good defensemen and a good goalie seems almost an impossible juggling act in today's NHL.
Semi-consistent good drafting and roster management is essential to even have a shot at sustaining a good seven or eight year run anymore of being a really good or top team in that timeframe.