Proposal: Det / NYI
- Thread starter rhef3
- Start date
Newsworthy
Registered User
WingsMJN2965
Registered User
- Oct 13, 2017
- 18,106
- 17,699
Number1RedWingsFan52
Registered User
Yeah not happening, One of Bouchard/Dobson Hughes or Wahlstrom will be available with the 6th pick. Not trading down sorry.
- Sep 27, 2017
- 5,388
- 2,733
rhef3
Registered User
Is the value right though, I'm sure this is an unlikely trade, but if this trade we're to take place would you see it as fair value for both sides ?
WingsMJN2965
Registered User
- Oct 13, 2017
- 18,106
- 17,699
When you don't consider the teams it may be. But your concept of Detroit trading down because they have, "Too many holes to fill" is way off, thus they don't value those 11th and 12th picks as much as the 6th.
They don't have, "Too many holes to fill" they have a few gaping holes. They have plenty of middle 6 forwards and bottom 4 defenders. They need a top line defender, and none of Boqvist/Hughes/Dobson/Bouchard are going to be there at 11th. Hell, Ty Smith may not even be there.
As far as a center goes, it's unlikely they get one in this draft at 11th or 12th that is a 1C, and we already have Larkin and Rasmussen to plug in at 2C, so that's pretty much a useless move.
IODCPiper
Registered User
- Jan 26, 2016
- 548
- 87
WingsMJN2965
Registered User
- Oct 13, 2017
- 18,106
- 17,699
lucaseider
Registered User
I wouldn't do the original trade let alone add a second, to important we get a blue chip d man, tho I wouldn't mind brady tkachuk either.
Kevin27NYI
Registered User
- Aug 5, 2009
- 19,784
- 5,850
WingsMJN2965
Registered User
- Oct 13, 2017
- 18,106
- 17,699
And Wings fans would rather keep #6, so looks like we're all in agreement.
rhef3
Registered User
It's not a link that says they are, it's all fabricated that if the wanted to and Detroit was looking to trade down, The link was there to show value of picks, that's all.
I know a certain redwing fan is against this but I'm more concerned with correct value.
Top D would be plenty available at 6.
I know a certain redwing fan is against this but I'm more concerned with correct value.
Top D would be plenty available at 6.
lilidk
Registered User
- Mar 4, 2008
- 9,849
- 3,588
It could be very good for both teams. AA is underrated, if you use him right he can be a game changer. At #6 you have more chance to get 1st line player.. there is #1 and then there's 4 more NHL ready players. Who knows if you can get something great
rhef3, you need to be a bit more careful then, the isles have absolutely o interest in moving up with both of those picks unless it were to number one and im sure buffalo isnt considering that.
we couldmove up using our 2 2nds if we desired a specific player
we couldmove up using our 2 2nds if we desired a specific player
no interest in AA whatso
no interest in AA whatsoever unless its for Andrew Ladd. which I doubt youd be interested in. cap space is at a premium for us so, AA is less than useless to us
CodeE
step on snek
Not interested in packaging 11+12 together to move up in the 1st.
Two very good players will fall to us, and I'm happy to take my chances on two strong rolls of the dice as opposed to one. Detroit can stay a 6 and pick who they want, we'll patiently wait and see who falls to us.
Two very good players will fall to us, and I'm happy to take my chances on two strong rolls of the dice as opposed to one. Detroit can stay a 6 and pick who they want, we'll patiently wait and see who falls to us.
think the value is close, but as most fans here are agreeing, it's not what would benefit both teams equally.
i'm an Ilses fan, and i would be ok with the trade, IF JT re-signs.
if not, i'd keep the picks, try and trade a vet or two, and go heavy into this draft.
i'm an Ilses fan, and i would be ok with the trade, IF JT re-signs.
if not, i'd keep the picks, try and trade a vet or two, and go heavy into this draft.
CREW99AW
Registered User
- Mar 12, 2002
- 40,928
- 3,389
WingsMJN2965
Registered User
- Oct 13, 2017
- 18,106
- 17,699
Sure, just as soon as you give us Beauvillier for Nielsen.
Goalie guy
Registered User
i told you that you wouldnt be interested
so why would we be interested in giving a top 12 pick for AA
a bad deal is a bad deal
we both need multiples on defense and AA doesnt help that. plus Beauviller is already a better player and is 3 years younger.. so AA is not something we need.
he's a good player but very redundant for us. youd be better off finding a team that needs a player like him
maybe montreal might consider AA and #6 for #3, they might not but they actually need playmakers
i get it you want to get 2 defenders instead of one, but to do that you have to give us something we actually need and you dont have that to offer
Last edited:
