Yet Dekeyser and Glendenning are injured. Could it possibly be that hockey is a physically demanding game?
Dekeyser's also had injury problems in his brief career.It's a physical game, but younger guys heal and bounce back quicker. Believe other wise, be my guest.
Well we knew Datsyuk would miss time, Richards was signed in large part because of that I'm sure. We knew Franzen couldn't be relied on either. Helm was a complete fluke injury and we also have Dekeyser and Glendening out so it's not only the old guys. But this is why Holland isn't as stressed out about moving bodies in order to create roster spots as this board is. As fans we sit during the summer and think "how is everyone going to fit on this team, there aren't enough spots!", but then the season hits and suddenly you realize that you're lucky if you play 1 game with the entire roster healthy.
It's not only old guys, but we also had our worse injury concerns when we were icing a bunch of old guys and being shocked at how many were on the IR/LTIR at any given moment. And I don't think it's surprising that it's been our older top6/9 players who routinely miss time. As you said, we knew coming in that Datsyuk/Franzen would miss time, employing older guys and leaning on them heavily is asking for repeated trips to the injured list.
For what it's worth, in the past I think part of it was the system Babcock employed. Over 82 games, I think it just wore nearly everyone down because it was a lot of emphasis on grinding and progressively less emphasis on skill, which seems like a bad recipe for our older, skilled guys. I think Blashill's system, with its tweeks, will be a bit easier on guys in that regard. Also, it's why I think the reserve spots are going to become more important. If we can more freely sub guys in/out of the lineup to give rest days to, we might be able to mitigate some of the injury risks. With the NHL's schedule and travel, I think it's something that is going to border on necessity. I'd still like to see roster limits raised, too.