How does this current prospect pool D compare to say Stuart Percy (former 1st rounder), Matt Finn & Jesse Blacker (former 2nd rounders) that the fan base once believed had bright futures based on CHL stats in the prospect pool.
How does this current prospect pool D compare to say Stuart Percy (former 1st rounder), Matt Finn & Jesse Blacker (former 2nd rounders) that the fan base once believed had bright futures based on CHL stats in the prospect pool.
In reality the success rate outside of top end prospects is very hit and mostly miss where a Frankie Corrado level of achievement will already be viewed as a success story.
How does this current prospect pool D compare to say Stuart Percy (former 1st rounder), Matt Finn & Jesse Blacker (former 2nd rounders) that the fan base once believed had bright futures based on CHL stats in the prospect pool.
In reality the success rate outside of top end prospects is very hit and mostly miss where a Frankie Corrado level of achievement will already be viewed as a success story.
can you show me a visbly stronger pool of 9 dmen for another team? while they may have 5 no team has 9 strong d prospects, off the top of my head philly has the strongest and they have 4 legit d prospects and after is the same as ours long shots
edite: while other teams top 4 d prospects are stronger for sure not many have more than that. We should target some D but our top 3 or 4 aren't horrible
Yeah I'm pretty strict. Mostly because even the best prospects fail a lot.
For me, "legit prospect" is someone I think has more than just a chance of being an NHLer in a best case scenario....for me it's someone who I think his average outcome (50th percentile projection) has him as an NHLer. Not near a lock to be an NHLer, but someone with a solid likely chance.
And yeah, that is pretty strict, because most prospects are longshots.