Defence.....

The List Of Jericho

Judas effect
Mar 1, 2002
18,024
3,500
Toronto
Considering the fact that most people thought the Penguins were doomed without Kris Letang in the playoffs and they won with a group that are mediocre at best. Is individual elite defending overrated compared to playing a solid team game with elite talent up front?
 

Bank Shot

Registered User
Jan 18, 2006
11,398
7,001
There isn't a cookie cutter formula for winning the Cup.

Having that number one defenceman will help your team be a Cup contender but every team that wins a Cup is built differently.
 

KingsFan7824

Registered User
Dec 4, 2003
19,375
7,463
Visit site
Is individual elite defending overrated compared to playing a solid team game with elite talent up front?

Yes, until next year when a team will win some other way. If the Pens win next year, with Letang, but no Malkin, well then having two top centers is overrated.

Every team is different. Pittsburgh happened to make it work. Not every team has one of Crosby or Malkin though, let alone both.
 

Prairie Habs

Registered User
Oct 3, 2010
11,965
12,382
Well, the other rule of thumb is you can't win without an all-star centre and the Preds lost theirs before the finals even started. One axiom or another was going to be broken this SCF.
 

SEALBound

Fancy Gina Carano
Sponsor
Jun 13, 2010
40,539
18,709
As someone said, the Pens defense is always under rated.

Dumoulin - top pairing dman
Hainsey - #4/5
Maatta - Top 4 dman
Daley - Top 4 dman
Cole -#4/5
Schultz - 4/5

With the pairings they ran they had balance. Any pairing could go against any line the other team through out there. They basically had 3 2nd pairings. Defense by committee. Nashville had an impressive top 4 but it was a black hole after that.

Besides, defense is a team effort. You still have the likes of Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin helping you play defense when the puck is in the defensive zone. Defense does not fall purely on the defensemen.
 

boredmale

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 13, 2005
42,441
7,011
As others pointed out anybody who plans to build defense like the Penguins and wants to go far in the playofffs better hope they have Crosby and Malkin like players up front
 
Jan 9, 2007
20,123
2,095
Australia
Well, the other rule of thumb is you can't win without an all-star centre and the Preds lost theirs before the finals even started. One axiom or another was going to be broken this SCF.

It doesn't really count as a broken axiom when they had their #1 center for as long as they did in the playoffs. Not to me, anyway.
 

ChiefWiggum

Registered User
Dec 17, 2016
1,197
198
Newfoundland
The 2016 and 2017 Penguins teams are all about depth and the ability to trust all lines. They won by playing a team game based on grit, hard work and determination and they're team system that every player bought into was able to carry them when they lost multiple key players.

Their defense is mediocre and has no ability to effectively break the puck out. But each defenseman knew what he could and couldn't do and bought into the team system of "just rim the puck" and each defenseman did it every time
 

Zirakzigil

Global Moderator
Jul 5, 2010
29,156
22,546
Canada
With the pairings they ran they had balance. Any pairing could go against any line the other team through out there. They basically had 3 2nd pairings. Defense by committee. Nashville had an impressive top 4 but it was a black hole after that.

Besides, defense is a team effort. You still have the likes of Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin helping you play defense when the puck is in the defensive zone. Defense does not fall purely on the defensemen.

This. They had some nasty injuries too. Cole played with a broken rib and hand during the finals. Depth made up for the fact Letang was injured. You could have the best defenseman in the world, but if hes surrounded by crap its not going to matter.
 

irunthepeg

Board man gets paid
May 20, 2010
35,289
3,209
The Peg, Canada
The general rules of winning formulas get thrown out the door when you have two players of Crosby and Malkin's caliber.

Which is funny because from around 2012-2014 it seemed like everyone was thinking the two star centre model would ultimately hinder the team. It's funny how they had that conference final series against the Bruins where they had no offense and then they turned it all around again and won 2 straight Cups.

There's not one winning formula to the Cup. If you have a star #1 defenseman, you'll probably lack in some other area. I think it's about knowing where you excel, where you lack, and trimming off some of where you excel to help where you lack.
 

Howboutthempanthers

Thread killer.
Sponsor
Sep 11, 2012
16,454
4,208
Brow. County, Fl.
There isn't a cookie cutter formula for winning the Cup.

Having that number one defenceman will help your team be a Cup contender but every team that wins a Cup is built differently.

Yes, until next year when a team will win some other way. If the Pens win next year, with Letang, but no Malkin, well then having two top centers is overrated.

Every team is different. Pittsburgh happened to make it work.

You know who doesn't know this? Our ownership. But yet, they feel smarter than everyone else about hockey.
 

BusQuets

Registered User
Jul 16, 2010
11,943
2,855
They are extremely underrated defensively and Pens' offense took care of the rest.
 

Aceboogie

Registered User
Aug 25, 2012
32,649
3,896
Remember on HF when everyone said you HAD to have a #1D and another top pairing D to win a cup? Fun times

Every year the template changes. Maybe the template is "have good players in whatever position?"
 

BB88

Registered User
Jan 19, 2015
40,862
20,465
Considering the fact that most people thought the Penguins were doomed without Kris Letang in the playoffs and they won with a group that are mediocre at best. Is individual elite defending overrated compared to playing a solid team game with elite talent up front?


Defense carried Nashville to finals, they just didn't even have a top6C in the finals.
Karlsson carried Ottawa to Eastern finals.

Not many teams can have player like Crosby, Malkin& Kessell in their primes at the same time.
 

BonMorrison

Registered User
Jun 17, 2011
33,691
9,488
Toronto, ON
Systems win championships and the Pens have a absolutely fantastic one. It's why I didn't think the loss of Letang was comparable to the loss of Johansen. Pittsburgh's system is much stronger than Nashville's and is built to overcome issues like that while the Preds faltered a lot when losing Joey.
 

lexlavender

Registered User
Jun 9, 2013
1,337
1,104
There are many ways in which the Penguins system is built to insulate their defense. Having speedy forwards allows for pushing from the D and making sure that if the D misses coverage, the forwards can cover. This isn't the same level as say a Sutter system where everyone is covered at all times, but the forwards are fast enough to get to the point where they can interrupt/obstruct out number attacks. Many times the Penguins don't actually stop rush chance shots, they simply make them very difficult. Once the rush chance gets quelled, they can pick up the puck in their D zone and fling it out to a streaking forward. It helps having an amazing tandem of goalies as well.

However, I believe a stronger possession team could give them trouble.
 

Paperbagofglory

Registered User
Nov 15, 2010
5,557
4,730
Because rosters are so watered down the weaknesses in every team is pretty balanced. Nashville had a weak forward group, Pittsburgh had a weak D group, but its easier to play team defense and shut down a team than it is to score a lot of goals. Throw in Malkin and Crosby on any watered down team with 30 clubs and they are competing in the Stanley cup finals, minus a few very bad rosters of course.

Its true that Nashville's defense was carrying their offense throughout the playoffs, but this was not going to last.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad