Okay, we have a 30+ page thread to lay into the Oilers organization again for being incompetent... enlightening.
Anyway, I'm not sure I agree with this mid-season Eakins firing. Here's why:
As a weak/young team in 2013, what the Oilers needed was either: (a) a veteran NHL coach with loads of experience and clout, or (b) a promoted minor league coach who knew the franchise's system and prospects inside and out. (Or they could have kept Ralph Kruger.)
Instead of doing either of these two logical things, MacTavish decided to make his mark on the organization and go with a "gut" hire of a coach who (a) didn't have NHL experience or clout and (b) didn't know the franchise and its prospects inside and out. It was a gutsy move by MacT, and it failed spectacularly.
It seems to be that now, at the end of 2014, the team's needs for a coach are the same as they were in mid-2013. Since the season is already a write-off in terms of making the playoffs, I wonder if it is wise to have two "interim" coaches behind the bench? While supplying some necessary catharsis for suffering fans (which is likely why this has happened now), it's not going to solve the larger problem -- unless Nelson ends up being the real coach of the future (a possibility). But if he is going to be the man, why cal him "interim"? Obviously management doesn't foresee him being their guy now. So, in effect, we have two interims to finish off this lost season.
Thus, by firing Eakins, they don't solve their coaching need, and they add TWO more short-term coaches into the mix -- precisely what developing young players don't need.
Hard to bear as the losing was, I do wonder if it might have been better to just leave Eakins in for the span of this season, take another top draft pick, and then hire the 'real' coach (meeting the criteria in my third paragraph, above) in summer? At least that way, the younger players are spared another +2 coaches to confuse them during their development.
_______________________________
Looking at it more positively, in the (still very) short time MacT has been GM, the albatross of his reign has been Eakins. And that albatross is now dead. So that might be good, at least mentally.
(Not sure about "visually"...)