i never heard of the possibility that Eakins sat Petry to punish him for an off-ice incident. To me, that makes some sense. The only other logical option is that he was still in injury recovery, but that doesn't jive with me because of his wife's tweet that night.
I don't see how it could be based on merit either. Petry has had his troubles in the past but so far this season he's been our most consistent producer. It seems every other Dman has had either had a bad game in Calgary, or a bad game in Vancouver. I don't see how it could be about skillsets either, since Petry has a better offensive dimension to his game than guys like Fayne and Ference (probably Nikitin too), and a better physical dimension than Schultz and Hunt (and probably our other Dmen too).
The trade route doesn't make any sense, because of course he is still an Oiler today. I suppose a deal might have fallen through that night, but that doesn't make sense to me. If a player is scratched over a trade, that means the trade is pretty much a done deal.
The last option is that Eakins is just completely out of touch, but unlike many here I don't believe that at all. He's a smart hockey mind who knows this game better than anyone here. I'm not buying into the caricature that's being painted on places like this board.
So to me, the option that makes the most sense is that something off-ice happened. That definitely flows well with what Jeff's wife tweeted and there is some other smoke that indicates that: namely that he signed a one year, just-get-me-the-heck-out-of-here deal.