frankieboy
Registered User
- Mar 10, 2010
- 2,350
- 195
I agree, HIP. Vanek was acquired at a very bad time when a full s***storm was brewing. A lot of fans blame Vanek for that as if things would be different if Moulson was here.
Sometimes chemistry isn't just ON the ice. It effects the locker room as well. I remember the 2009 Yankees, they won with Melky Cabrera, Johnny Damon and Hideki Matsui. They gladly let all three go in free agency or in trades, brought in Curtis Granderson via a trade, a way superior player to those three mentioned, yet the following year, they were lost without the leadership and chemistry lost by letting those guys go. Chemistry goes a long way when it comes to winning.
I agree, HIP. Vanek was acquired at a very bad time when a full s***storm was brewing. A lot of fans blame Vanek for that as if things would be different if Moulson was here.
I have not seen him put a good feed on JT's stick SINCE he came here.
Same here. Vanek is not the issue at all. But I'd still trade him, I don't like his game, even though he's pretty damn good.
Oh look, another blame Vanek thread.
Yes, its Vanek's fault that Grabner, Bailey, Regin, Bouchard, and Martin can't produce offensively if their lives depended on it. Its Vanek's fault Visnovsky got hurt and the entire defense is horrendous and we have the 2nd most goals allowed in the NHL. Its Vanek's fault we have below average goaltending. Its Vanek's fault our coach is a moron and refuses to play rookies that earn their spots over ****** vets, and bases his coaching decisions off of superstition. Its Vanek's fault our owner doesn't care about winning.
If you're gonna blame the Isles' struggles on team chemistry being lost, then none of the guys on the team should be playing professional sports. If they're so godamn butthurt because one of their pals got traded then they should all find a new profession. Its the ****ing NHL, you don't get sad and decide to stop producing just because someone was traded. Jesus Lord.
What is they traded Steve Thomas during the Turgeon era?
A better comparison for Moulson from that team would be Derek King. So, what if they had traded King and draft picks for, say, Dave Andreychuk or Brendan Shanahan in 1993/94?
First of all, a large part of the fan-base would have driven King to the airport, as he was a frequent whipping-boy on those early-90s teams. Second of all, I think we'd have seen an improvement in that first line.
The total trade would have been King, Brett Lindros* and Jason Holland for Andreychuk or Shanny. Absolutely in theory only but keep in mind that Andreychuk was traded in '93 with Puppa and a 1st for an aging Grant Fuhr.
*Lindros' career was derailed by concussions but I personally think he had the tools to be a decent 2nd liner.
Wang lost $1.2 Mil last year according to Forbes.
I don't think you qualify as "old school", being born in '82 and all. Just sayin...
King was the whipping boy after Turgeon left.
He scored 38 and 40 while being Turgeon's wing.
When PT was traded King fell off the map.
Missed these I guess?