ghost85875
Registered User
- Apr 9, 2021
- 99
- 215
What the hell are you talking about?
Care to write a constructive reply?
What the hell are you talking about?
The point is ethics.
It's ethic to tell someone the truth.
It's also ethic to give the freedom of choice.
It's not ethic to discriminate against those who are not willing to make a particular choice.
And you know the moment is coming, that we aren't going to have any choice.
Vax passport, a lot of employers forcing their employees to take the vax, etc.
Sounds like the freedom of choice is quite fleeting.
The point is ethics.
It's ethic to tell someone the truth.
It's also ethic to give the freedom of choice.
It's not ethic to discriminate against those who are not willing to make a particular choice.
And you know the moment is coming, that we aren't going to have any choice.
Care to stop speaking in riddles? Please tell us how the time is coming where we have no choice... What exactly does that mean?Care to write a constructive reply?
You can quit your job if you don't agree. My job doesn't let me smoke pot all day, are they infringing on my rights?
The point is ethics.
It's ethic to tell someone the truth.
It's also ethic to give the freedom of choice.
It's not ethic to discriminate against those who are not willing to make a particular choice.
And you know the moment is coming, that we aren't going to have any choice.
That is not the same thing as having “no choice.”Vax passport, a lot of employers forcing their employees to take the vax, etc.
Sounds like the freedom of choice is quite fleeting.
The point is ethics.
It's ethic to tell someone the truth.
It's also ethic to give the freedom of choice.
It's not ethic to discriminate against those who are not willing to make a particular choice.
And you know the moment is coming, that we aren't going to have any choice.
You can quit your job if you don't agree. My job doesn't let me smoke pot all day, are they infringing on my rights?
In a vacuum you are right.
But why are such arguments always ignore that there is a massive sanitary crisis that is threatening the lives of the most vulnerable, as well as the ability for our health care system to dispense care, not only to covid-sick people but also eventually to anyone ill ridden individual.
I find it amusing that you’re trying to drive home a point about ethics. Not saying you’re wrong. But I can easily make a point on the other side that getting a vaccine to protect the vulnerable is the ethical thing to do.
They are not forcing you to vaccinate. However, you have to live with the consequences of your choice. That's how society work and there is nothing new or unethical about that.
You just defended the oppressors of LGBT+ and of minorities, back when they had overwhelming power.
Back then, gay people were fired routinely if the boss found out. Also, they were socially persecuted, denounced in the newspapers, etc.
They also used health arguments, among others.
That's quite a weak argument.
You don't choose to be LGBT. You don't choose to be black. You choose not to take a vaccine.
The fact you are equating those together is utterly disgusting. What's next, vaccine mandate is the same as the holocaust?
Did you just assume that there isn't genderfluid people?
Vax passport, a lot of employers forcing their employees to take the vax, etc.
Sounds like the freedom of choice is quite fleeting.
You don't choose to be LGBT. You don't choose to be black. You choose not to take a vaccine.
The fact you are equating those together is utterly disgusting. What's next, vaccine mandate is the same as the holocaust?
Anti-Vaxxers were already equating the vaccine passport to wearing a Star of David under Nazi occupation. Which is utterly psychotic
Being genderfluid is not a choice either.
It's incredibly ignorant (not to mention deeply offensive) to try to compare the actual oppression that some groups have experienced to anti-vaxxers having to stay away from restaurants because they DECIDED not to get the vaccine.You just defended the oppressors of LGBT+ and of minorities, back when they had overwhelming power.
Back then, gay people were fired routinely if the boss found out. Also, they were socially persecuted, denounced in the newspapers, etc.
They also used health arguments, among others.
That's not how some genderfluid people feel.
And you said "They are not forcing you to vaccinate. However, you have to live with the consequences of your choice. That's how society work and there is nothing new or unethical about that."
Why are you trying to pin choice vs feature? That's a horrifically bad line to draw.
Basically, you're saying it's ok for someone to be discriminated, persecuted or killed if they dare to belief a different religion in an intolerant society, or dare to raise the little finger in a society who deemed it to be heavily punished.
There's a huge difference between 'persecution' and keeping people safe. You shouldn't need this explained to you.That's not how some genderfluid people feel.
And you said "They are not forcing you to vaccinate. However, you have to live with the consequences of your choice. That's how society work and there is nothing new or unethical about that."
Why are you trying to pin choice vs attribute? That's a horrifically bad line to draw.
Basically, you're saying it's ok for someone to be discriminated, persecuted or killed if they dare to belief a different religion in an intolerant society, or dare to raise the little finger in a society who deemed it to be heavily punished, etc.