He's a really good defenseman. He's slightly overpaid and Hawk fans give him a ton of crap because we gave up too much for him. But he's a really good two way defender that if paired with a good to elite puck mover that can play lots of minutes would shine.
Again, it would be a bad trade for Toronto.Sounds to me like Rielly would be the perfect partner.
Problem is I don't know how you do it because I think most would agree Jones isn't worth Marner and beyond that I don't think Marner would waive to go to Chicago given where Chicago is in their rebuild. It's going to be a long process.
Unless Chicago retains money and given the length of Jones contract , I'm not convinced they'd do that.I don't know how you make it work.
I do know that Rielly, Jones, McCabe and Benoit is the basis for a defense I could support, although preferably Benoit would be on the bottom pair, but he's still a piece
What?Dude winning trades on a message board is a meaningless exercise.
You were talking about me hyping him up like I'm a car salesman. That ain't me my guy.What?
I don't even want the player, really.
This. I'm not sure if Marner is worth much at all at this point. He is a high paid player that only a few teams can afford, and the NMC basically means that he gets to pick where he goes. He probably doesn't want to go to a rebuilding team, and contenders don't often have 11M or 11M in tradeable contracts that Toronto would want to take back. The return for Marner won't be great, and the most valuable part of that deal for Toronto will be the cap space. The key will be finding a team to take Marner, so they can afford to make a separate move for a guy like Jones.The “Marner is worth more” crowd doesn’t realize he has a NMC to waive and will want a raise on 11m already. They gain instant cap space and 4m beyond by not signing “I’m a god” Marner for 13.5. Moving him also opens space for someone else while gaining a D.
I've been a huge critic of Jones, I think he hasn't been very good defensively in some time, but Toronto needs a top end puck mover on the back end, and he is that. It's hard to see where the fit is in terms of trading for him though, unless they dump Marner for cap space and futures.
This. I'm not sure if Marner is worth much at all at this point. He is a high paid player that only a few teams can afford, and the NMC basically means that he gets to pick where he goes. He probably doesn't want to go to a rebuilding team, and contenders don't often have 11M or 11M in tradeable contracts that Toronto would want to take back. The return for Marner won't be great, and the most valuable part of that deal for Toronto will be the cap space. The key will be finding a team to take Marner, so they can afford to make a separate move for a guy like Jones.
If they want to move on from Marner, they will probably do it this summer, to a team that will be interested in an extension. The value in moving on from Marner is in the cap space. Of course they would get some assets back as well.Marner has 1 year left before hitting free agency.
Seth Jones has SIX more years at a 9.5 million cap hit taking him to age 36-37. How are the Leafs getting better with this move??
If they want to move on from Marner, they will probably do it this summer, to a team that will be interested in an extension. The value in moving on from Marner is in the cap space. Of course they would get some assets back as well.
I don't care one bit if the Leafs target Jones or not, but a player like Jones would make the Leafs better. They've lacked a top end puck mover for a long, long time now. Regardless, it wouldn't be a Toronto - Chicago trade, as Marner isn't likely to want to sign an extension to be stuck in Chicago. I also would be surprised to see Jones waive him modified NTC if the inquiring team was Toronto.
Nope. Haven't read the rest of the thread.
If we're flipping Marner it should be for a player like Vince Dunn.
Better hit, term and player.
The problem is that Seattle woudn't do it.Nope. Haven't read the rest of the thread.
If we're flipping Marner it should be for a player like Vince Dunn.
Better hit, term and player.
Because GMs can be convinced into make poor trades, we see it happen all the time. Marner has name value and regular season value. Fills seats, scores points, will sell merchandise and maybe even get his team into the playoffs.Why would Seattle trade its #1 defender and best player locked in at nice contract for next 3 years for Mitch Marner?
/threadJones didn't suddenly start sucking. He is just not an elite play driver that can make it work on a bad team. Not all very effective players are. Put him with Rielly and all the talk will be about the resurgence of Jones.
But then you start having to worry about when the real decline does start.
There's lots of horrendous trades that end up happening that HF says "They would never accept something like that"The problem is that Seattle woudn't do it.
You go ahead and keep hoping that your GM is going to make that miracle happen. Check back into your GM's history and I am not sure he is the guy that is going to do the hustling.There's lots of horrendous trades that end up happening that HF says "They would never accept something like that"
Kadri for Barrie + Kerfoot
Hall for Larsson
Devon Toews for picks
Tkachuk for Huberdeau (kind of forced his way out but still)
Sergachev for Drouin
Forsberg for Erat
Rask for Raycroft
Point being, GM's get hustled sometimes.
Why not get both, lol??Seth Jones? Why not Darnell Nurse?
Having a hard time seeing others are writing here that Jones for Marner is an option… Hawks would have to add a bit. Maybe Reichel would be a chip, but I would have to see it to believe it.