Imagine not using every possible thing at your disposal.Imagine being the owner that has Dubas asking for another 10 million to try and make the playoffs.
Personally I think the longer Ceci is out of the lineup the better their defense is. So let's assume they keep him on LTIR for the remainder of the season and Rielly is able to return on schedule, if Toronto makes the playoffs do you even want Ceci playing again?It seems more likely they do it with Ceci.
Personally I think the longer Ceci is out of the lineup the better their defense is. So let's assume they keep him on LTIR for the remainder of the season and Rielly is able to return on schedule, if Toronto makes the playoffs do you even want Ceci playing again?
We already waste much more each season propping up other less successful teams down south. What is the difference besides it is actually doing us some good for a change.
I dont care if it takes every loophole possible to win. Just ****ing win
Playoff wins and home games in the playoffs is lucrative. Series wins and winning a couple rounds would more than make up the costs. First round exits are bad.Missing the playoffs while rushing your top defenseman back while losing the cap space to improve and still missing the playoffs is suicidal. Rielly needs to heal up and come back 100% healthy in game one of the playoffs.Imagine being the owner that has Dubas asking for another 10 million to try and make the playoffs.
If he doesn't then hes an idiot. Based on Riellys play this season he won't be that much of a factor on whether the leafs qualify or not.
That matters not.
If it is allowed under the current CBA thats all that matters. Not what the BOG or even Bettman thinks.
The leafs making a deep run and winning the cup would be a financial boon to the league as a whole. The old boys club would love that more then they would hate the CBA being followed to the letter. Hell Pridham wrote the damn thing. If anyone knows what is and isnt allowed it is him
We are largely talking about 2 different things: a) the current rules in the CBA; versus, b) the future & what might happen to the next CBA.
I don't know what the majority of the BoG wants or supports as far as changes to the next CBA, but wondered (aloud) if what happened in the past (the initiation of the first CBA) might provide some insight.
As for the last paragraph, you are projecting your opinion or providing conjecture on what you think (or hope) will happen. That's OK, but its still conjecture nonetheless.