hatterson
Registered User
To me it’s an obvious goal and the hilarity of it being no goal after the two in the Bruins/Panthers series being allowed is extra funny.
The issue here is that the highlighted stuff does not, in fact, appear to be the most relevant part of the rule. A second issue is that because the rule switches between a reference to the goalie being in the crease and contact being outside the crease, it leaves a grey area where technically two parts of the rule can contradict one another: contact outside of the crease with a goalie who is mostly inside his crease.For those of you who don’t know the rule, here it is highlighted with relevant info.
If you think Duchene’s positioning when he bumped Georgiev before Makar ran into him impaired his ability to get across to make the save in any way then you have to agree with the no goal call.
Whether he’s inside the crease or not isn’t relevant to the discussion.
View attachment 873071
Does it say something in there about moving away, or are you thinking that moving away is required to be making a reasonable effort to avoid contact?
This is the grey and reality of the situation and some people on here are looking for black and white is a subjective situation.That's a goal but with it being a season ender + the call originally being no goal, it wasn't gonna get reversed.
Yes, in this instance the reasonable effort would be to move away to avoid contact after contact already was initiated.
Ah. Well I don't agree that was necessary. You would need to avoid contact BEFORE making contact. Which he did with stopping where he did.Yes, in this instance the reasonable effort would be to move away to avoid contact after contact already was initiated.
Ah. Well I don't agree that was necessary. You would need to avoid contact BEFORE making contact. Which he did with stopping where he did.
Need to try to not contact before making contact which he did. Too late once you do. Now if it's for some longer amount of time you should try to move. But he didn't have time before being knocked in. Although really it looks like Georgiev was already moving away anyway.If I step on your foot and keep standing on your foot, I'm not trying to avoid that contact unless I step off your foot.
Need to try to not contact before making contact which he did. Too late once you do. Now if it's for some longer amount of time you should try to move. But he didn't have time before being knocked in. Although really it looks like Georgiev was already moving away anyway.
We can post bits of rules forever. In these playoffs, the refs don't seem to be looking at the same rule game to game, either. Hence, the endless debates here.
I like how you included the rules, then omitted the parts that question your conclusion.1) Rule 69 – Interference on the Goalkeeper69.1 Interference on the Goalkeeper - This rule is based on the premise that an attacking player’s position, whether inside or outside the crease, should not, by itself, determine whether a goal should be allowed or disallowed.
2) Goals should be disallowed ..... an attacking player, either by his positioning or by contact, impairs the goalkeeper’s ability to move freely .....
As you can see from the rules it does not matter in this case where the contact was made. What actually matters is 1) the contact was made, and 2) it impaired the goalie ability to move freely.
The result: the goal was disallowed correctly based on the rules.
Right so not relevant and had tried avoiding contact initially anyway which satisfies the requirement.Which is exactly what I said earlier.
He didn't move away though. That's the point. Then, I don't think he had time to do so before Makar came into the picture, but there's no clear evidence that he made an effort to move away.
Here is the next portion of the rule you also ignored.No, this topic is a case of a bad student who have seen the correct answer, and after that gave the wrong answer and started arguing with the teacher that the student's wrong answer is correct.
And the bad student main supporting argument is the conspiracy theory about the evil school that does not want the bad students to succeed and does everything to fail them.
Right so not relevant and had tried avoiding contact initially anyway which satisfies the requirement.
People pretending that this is the worst call ever need to give their heads a shake. Not even close.
LoooooolThat was the worst call ever, and there is no controversy - it was a good goal. End of story.