I don’t think the team wants Gus or Sogaard backing up, they will want them playing a starters load no matter the league.Oh, you got me optimistic for a second... maybe your wording brought some confusion ("protect")
Well, this is what I would have done :
Protect Gustavsson, leave Murray and Daccord exposed
Seattle most likely don't pick Murray because his AAV is high and has 3 years left. There will be less risky options. Unless they want to take costly gambles right away, can't see it. They also probably don't take soon to be 25 y/o and unproven (and recently injured) Daccord who has a career 0.894 SV% in the NHL. There will be several better options
NHL : Murray, Gustavsson
AHL : Daccord, Sogaard
ECHL = Mandolese
Daccord would probably play a few games as goalies often get injured.
Notes : Sogaard is way too good to go to the ECHL, well at least IMO.
Mandolese is pretty young too, probably a good place for him to develop next season
I think he's right. Between Zaitsev, Zub, and Brown they have three vets and they have JBD and Thomson to push for spots. Brannstrom and Mete have also played RHD quite a bit and can fill in.
LHD is where we maybe end up with a signing.
all good, Brady doesn’t play for less then Chabot. That only makes sense
I don’t think the team wants Gus or Sogaard backing up, they will want them playing a starters load no matter the league.
Just make sure they're all rfas when the contracts expire please and don't f*** up like we did with Stone and to a lesser degree Duchene again.
I hope so. I've always been more worried about another defenceman to spell Chabot rather than finding him a partner. Getting him a good partner won't reduce his minutes as much as having another defenceman that DJ can throw on the ice instead of Chabot.
If Murray gets hurt I would expect Gus/Daccord comes up to start and Forsberg remains the backup.You're right in the sense that they are clearly (well, IMO again) the team's 2 most important goalies, but with Murray often injured, Gus could end playing many NHL games. He's shown he's totally ready for it IMO
As for Sogaard, could simply split starts with Daccord, he's pretty you and very limited pro experience, that'd be a good workload start for him.
This!
No, no God no, etc
Please Dorion don't screw up another off-season
Need both.
A Methot for Chabot and a strong 2nd LD D-man (which is why the Sanderson pick makes a lot of sense)
I hope so. I've always been more worried about another defenceman to spell Chabot rather than finding him a partner. Getting him a good partner won't reduce his minutes as much as having another defenceman that DJ can throw on the ice instead of Chabot.
Chabot is making $8 mill and Brady can’t be paid less then Chabot. Chabot might be a better player but his stats where no near justifying $8 million when he signed
I doubt Ottawa has any real signing bonus money for Brady (maybe a million here or there) so the AVV will have to be high because he won’t be getting the tax break on the signing bonus.
all good, Brady doesn’t play for less then Chabot. That only makes sense
How so? Contracts are made using precedent. There's no precedent of a forward who's career high is 45 points getting 8 million a year. None.
It's very likely he signs for 3 years, in the 6/6.5 range
How so? Contracts are made using precedent. There's no precedent of a forward who's career high is 45 points getting 8 million a year. None.
It's very likely he signs for 3 years, in the 6/6.5 range
If Sens are able to get him to an 8 year deal, which I’m skeptical of, I’d think it would be in the 8 x 7 range. Can’t see the Brady and Walt hitching his wagon to a long term deal after these 3 seasons.Brady 3 x 5.5/6 on a bridge
I know we all love Brady, but it is only a matter of time before he is outscored by Norris and Batherson.
My preference would be 6yr-42M. 4,7,7,8,8,8 Still young for him to hit big, big money afterwards and get some decent term