Isn't first line talent.
Good for the third line though. Id think Isles fans would take Conacher over Bailey anyway.
I haven't really focused on Conacher's ability to play defense, so I'm not quick to replace Bailey with him in a 3rd line role. Bailey is a responsible 3rd line player. People don't like his offense because it is spotty, but this team desperately needs competent defensive forwards, which the 3rd line currently (Bailey-Nielsen-Kulemin) is fabulous at. If you move Conacher there, then that changes the dynamic of that line unless Conacher can assume that kind of role (and judging from a history of going to top 6 to waivers leads me to believe he can't).
I'm in the camp that wants more size on JT's left. Although, the league has turned very much into pairs of dominant forwards as opposed to a whole line. Many teams who have two great 1st liners constantly rotate the 3rd player game after game, season after season. It's not so much putting our best forward in that LW spot, but more about finding the right balance for ALL of our lines. I do really like Nelson playing with them as far as matching skills, but Nelson at 2C could be huge for us. And as mentioned before, I like our 3rd line, so I don't want to disrupt much. (I don't even know where Grabner fits and it's probably just he and Bailey fighting for the same role). Which I guess is why I always come back to why Lee isn't in that spot with Conacher in the AHL. Young future with size and scoring ability who will probably be exposed defensively in a 3rd line role. It's almost too perfect and I still think we will see this eventually -- it will work itself there. How weird would it be if our juggled scratch is our 1st line LW?