I was looking at the passed few drafts, and am I the only one who thinks they just draft really bad?
I was looking at the passed few drafts, and am I the only one who thinks they just draft really bad?
They don't only draft bad, they develop players horribly too.
Ahh ok. I I was just wondering cuz I was looking through past drafts and it seems like teams beire an after then gave more impact players everytime. When did Howson start?
Howson took over in 2007, but literally was hired a week before the Draft. Part of him being hired was keeping most of the staff that had existed during the previous regime.
Most of the focus on their bad drafts will be on their first rounders. Klesla was the consensus best player remaining in the 2000 Draft, but they didn't do him any favors by rushing him into the lineup.
2003 should have helped, but Zherdev didn't pan out like they thought--then GM Doug MacLean proudly declared they had Zherdev #1 on their list. Back in 2001, they shipped off their 2003 2nd rounder to Dallas for Grant Marshall. Dallas turned that pick (33rd overall) into Loui Eriksson.
2004, they picked #4 in a draft where there was thought to be a set top 3 with Ovechkin/Malkin/Barker. Columbus opted to trade down and missed with their picks.
2005, I think all of us would have taken Brule. But they rushed him and injuries derailed his development.
2006, they picked sixth when most considered a top tier of five. Their decision came down to Derick Brassard or Peter Mueller.