Marotte Marauder
Registered User
- Aug 10, 2008
- 8,587
- 2,442
It is a MUCH easier situation for King to come in after JC than it was JC coming in for Q.
Big difference.
Big difference.
Yep, it's called human nature and at this level a happy player/team will usually outperform an uptight, unhappy group.You can be professional all you want, not being in the right mental state of mind affects your game. A coach can easily affect your mental well being, and if its constantly negative, its not good for you. Teams change coaches and start performing well just because it's a new, fresh start, without system changes, probably because their mind is more at ease. Effort has nothing to do about what I am talking about.
I am thinking that any coach that came in after Q was going to have a difficult time, especially with the core vets and maybe not so much with the young players.It is a MUCH easier situation for King to come in after JC than it was JC coming in for Q.
Big difference.
I am thinking that any coach that came in after Q was going to have a difficult time, especially with the core vets and maybe not so much with the young players.
I look at it like this: If you have a good boss you'll go to bat for them and work harder for them because they know they got your back.It affects your work when you don’t like, trust your boss.
Or when you think the guy is unqualified.
I get what Pez wrote earlier but what if “the room” all feels the same?
JC lost me for the final time when he handed the marker board to the players.
How many of them thought “this guy has no f***ing clue?”
He should have been drawing out the play they worked on under his tutelage for an hour last week.
Cookson, 60, was most recently an assistant coach with HC Lugano of the National League in Switzerland from December 2019 to April 2021. There, he coached current Blackhawks forward Philipp Kurashev.
They aren't, no. But, they are similar in the fact that your coach(boss) can make your job/life miserable.Playing professional sports isn't anything like a normal job, so I always find it strange when people draw comparisons to "work". Coaching isn't anything like being a normal boss, either.
They aren't, no. But, they are similar in the fact that your coach(boss) can make your job/life miserable.
John Tortorella says "hi".That really doesn't happen anymore. Coaching has evolved.
That really doesn't happen anymore. Coaching has evolved.
John Tortorella says "hi".
I wasnt talking about coaches that scream and yell. People dont get a long sometimes, and can make lives miserable in different ways. It's clear some players didn't enjoy JC as a coach. It's not really that complicated.So, a handful of coaches in the entire league?
Btw is there a real definition of ‘associate coach?’
There's fewer hard-ass coaches than their used to be. And their methods are less and less effective on todays' player. But there are still some of those guys working. And there are still GMs out there willing to hire that type of coach.So, a handful of coaches in the entire league?
I think if you were a fly on the wall in most NHL dressing rooms you would change that view.There's fewer hard-ass coaches than their used to be. And their methods are less and less effective on todays' player. But there are still some of those guys working. And there are still GMs out there willing to hire that type of coach.
Doubtful. None of the noted hard assed coaches have had abundant success lately. Torts career was circling the drain even before he "left" his last post. Now he's doing TV, hoping to be the next Cherry. Babcock is pretty much persona non grata in the NHL. Therrien took an assistants job to keep working. Sutter seems to be an outlier right now.I think if you were a fly on the wall in most NHL dressing rooms you would change that view.