Bills09
Registered User
Whats the book on this kid.
Seen him a few times, and really has me impressed.
Seen him a few times, and really has me impressed.
He should be a 40 point winger. A guy that can play on any line, but will most likely find himself on the third. He's a really, really big guy and uses his size well. He's physical, very smart, great defensively, and actually very fast despite his size. He won the fastest skater during this year's Sens skills competition. Offensively, he's good at picking up garbage, and has a knack for being in the right place. He can generate assists off the cycle, and is an average passer. Quick release. Also doesn't mind carrying the puck, although Spezza does most of that on his current line. He's had a handful of fights down in Binghamton, too.
All in all, the guy doesn't pretty much everything well, but won't wow anybody with his skill. He doesn't really have any flaws that I can think of other than the fact that you would like to see him demolish somebody once in a while. Most Sens fans will agree that Mike Fisher was more effective as a winger. I would say Greening resembles that Fisher. Big, strong, fast and a good two-way guy.
I would also add that he's very intelligent as well. A Cornell grad with a lineage of educated family memebers, Greening is a thinking man who's smarts translate on the ice as well. I believe he picked up an Acedemic All-American award in his last year in the Ivy league. I think Greening will be a great utility player that can be used in all situations and I'm excited to see how he'll progress over the course of a full season.
Don't forget he almost won the hardest shot too at over 100 MPH.
Seems like Fisher with the whole skill package, speed, size, shot, decent vision and puck carrying. We'll see if he has any hands or creativity as well as the one key component Fisher lacked, hockey sense. He seems like a very smart guy off the ice, we'll see how he develops.
I'm probably the farthest possible from Fisher's biggest fan, but if Greening ever becomes near what Fisher is, or was before, I will buy you a Greening jersey, personally deliver it to your door, and leave a sweet note and a box of chocolates on top of it.
And I really like Greening, too. I'm just making this wager because I'm pretty sure he won't reach that level, but he will still be a very good, valuable player. He sure as hell won't bring the physicality that Fisher brought, and he's a step below in offensive tools.
I don't disagree with you that it'll be hard for greening to reach that level but... Offensive tools and fisher doesn't match up? Speed, big body, hockey sense, vision, are all things greening has already shown flashes of better than fish ever did. The shot? Greening seems to surprise goalies more whenever shoots, fisher just left a mark in the middle of their chest.
We really haven't seen a weak game from greening since maybe his first couple games. If he's our 3rd line lw of the future... We look good on left side. Regarding physicality, greening uses his frame all over the ice to win battles similar to a way a non physical player like toews uses his.
It's funny, but true. I can't think of another player whose intelligence really factors into his on-ice play.