happyaccident
Registered User
- May 14, 2013
- 2,226
- 0
Morgan Reilly should be suing Franson for the lack of veteran support that he was supposed to provide as his partner last season. Which hindered his development and will hence cost him money.
That sounds like loser talk IMO. Cody Franson earns more than the average, because his economic contribution is greater. Hockey players offer entertainment that most cannot and therefore higher pay ought to be expected.There's no guarantee he would have made Nashville. At that age, I'd say $62,000 (I think that is around what it said he made) is exceptionally good lol, especially when that's the least amount of money he's made to date. When the worst financial year you've had being out in the workplace is the average salary for good job, that people usually have to pay to go to school in order to be qualified for said job; you're coming out ahead in life.
EDIT: Thought it was about a newly filed lawsuit. If he filed it at the time of the accident, then eh, nothing really to complain about here.
there sure is a lot of legal expertise in this thread.
I'm not going to bother to dig up all of the details of this case (it doesn't look like the document linked on the last page specifies what actually happened in the accident). It will be up to the courts to decide if it has merit or not. But if my career were adversely affected by an accident that the other driver was at fault for, you can bet that i would consider legal action even if i didn't need the award to get by.
I understand lawsuits take time to actually get to court but the article was posted in May of 2014 and doesn't give us a day that the lawsuit was filed so based on that I am going to assume that he did so fairly recently.
Around May he would have been negotiating his contract, and if you want to disregard this one we can go back to every contract he has negotiated because with him it has been rinse and repeat.
Nothing towards the OP, but I don't understand why this is just posted now as new news if the actual article is a couple months old. Would be nice if it was included in the OP that the article is from a couple months back.
** Also no I didn't read the article as it was pretty clear what Franson intentions were just from the OP. My opinion doesn't change after reading it either.
Generally it's insurance vs insurance. Unless this other person was driving without insurance. So yeah, no, not basically assuring that this person will have money problems for the rest of his/her life.....
Morgan Reilly should be suing Franson for the lack of veteran support that he was supposed to provide as his partner last season. Which hindered his development and will hence cost him money.
These guys get taxed 50 percent in taxes, pay huge percentages to their agents, pay huge property taxes, Usually support a lot of people, are pretty much expected to donate to charity etc, plus most have little to no financial intelligence. suddenly 3.5 mill really isn't that much... Considering he's a bottom pair d-man you never no when you can be out of work.
These guys get taxed 50 percent in taxes, pay huge percentages to their agents, pay huge property taxes, Usually support a lot of people, are pretty much expected to donate to charity etc, plus most have little to no financial intelligence. suddenly 3.5 mill really isn't that much... Considering he's a bottom pair d-man you never no when you can be out of work.
I'm stunned. I mean, he's taken the Leafs to the cleaners for cash, now he needs to go back to the Perds for more?
Maybe someone could tell me at what income level one losses the right to petition a court. Here I thought we were all equal in our right to seek redress through the courts. I see now that someone that makes a high income from playing hockey, cannot sue someone for negligence if they are injured in a car accident. The funny thing is that some of these idiots who would deny Franson due process of the law would be the very first to sue if they were ever in an accident.
To be fair, the OP made it sound like he was blaming the accident for his inability to negotiate a better RFA deal and it seemed current.
Also, I do find it amusing when people call other people idiots and then misuse terms like "Due process of law" when trying to sound high and mighty.
To be fair, the OP made it sound like he was blaming the accident for his inability to negotiate a better RFA deal and it seemed current.
Also, I do find it amusing when people call other people idiots and then misuse terms like "Due process of law" when trying to sound high and mighty.
I just reread my post and I see now that I inexplicably added, in my haste to post, an unwanted "the" to process of law. You were right...I am an idiot and deserve to be called out for my sloppiness.
It's somewhat understandable. We don't know if the crash has had any long-term damage to Franson's ability to play hockey nor do we know if there's any sort of psychological damage done to him from the crash. How many years is Franson going to be in the league? What will he be able to do when he's in his older years?
Some athletes have genuine financial difficulties after they retire because they can't sustain the lifestyle they had when they were playing. After taxes, agent costs, Franson has to determine how the money he's earned will sustain him for the rest of his life.
What I don't get is, how much does he expect to win from the case.
Actually, Due process, is a specific term that only applies to the government's action against private citizens or corporations. Honestly I wouldn't have disagreed with anything you said in principle, but when you start of calling people who disagree with your position idiots, and then misuse terminology to support your position it makes me