blahblah
Registered User
- Nov 24, 2005
- 21,327
- 972
He's a fourth line center
I really appreciate you proving my point.
He's a fourth line center
I really appreciate you proving my point.
That he is a fourth time center? Agree. Except that really wasn't your point.
hrr hrr.
I'm firming convinced there are only a small handful of people around here that can be honest with their assessment of players. It sure makes it easier to dump him if you convince yourself that he's "just" a 4th line center doesn't it?
We know I'm not a fan of Savard, but at least I'm honest enough to say he's a 3/4 in this league. I don't think Bob is consistent enough to be worth 7+ million, but I say that when he's on his game he's top 5 in the league.
That's... actually the first time I can recall your ever actually saying either of those things.
Not that I doubt you or anything; just that I don't think said opinions are widely advertised.
Maybe, question is whether getting to the playoffs was a good thing.
Maybe, question is whether getting to the playoffs was a good thing.
It was a VERY good thing. No harm in falling 10 places in a weak draft.
I presume they're a little more on the ball than that.I wasn't referring to the draft position. I was referring to giving the FO a possible misrepresentation of how good the team really is. In reality we are more likely a bubble team.
hrr hrr.
I'm firming convinced there are only a small handful of people around here that can be honest with their assessment of players. It sure makes it easier to dump him if you convince yourself that he's "just" a 4th line center doesn't it?
We know I'm not a fan of Savard, but at least I'm honest enough to say he's a 3/4 in this league. I don't think Bob is consistent enough to be worth 7+ million, but I say that when he's on his game he's top 5 in the league.
Yes, he could very well be the odd man out. However he isn't just a 4th line center.
Mr. rare Honest assessmentToot your own horn much? Rhetorical question.
No. You're right. He's also a dime-a-dozen penalty killer as well as a 4rth line center (on anything but a really, really bad team) who went 45 games without a goal. His 6 goals were completely vital to the regular season success of the CBJ!!! Oh, I forgot. He really steps it up in playoff elimination games. LOL. Make that ROTFLMAO.
Anyone who real thinks that a player like Karlsson moves the meter for a hockey team in a substantial way doesn't get NHL hockey personnel options. Wild Beel-type players are available all the time during the off season and usually make the waiver wires weekly during the season. As an added bonus, most of them will even throw a check.
Apparently this applies to Tortorella who, in a post-game presser, said that Karlsson (along with Wennberg) has a few more levels to reach in his development and will eventually be a high-end player.
Apparently this applies to Tortorella who, in a post-game presser, said that Karlsson (along with Wennberg) has a few more levels to reach in his development and will eventually be a high-end player.
I presume they're a little more on the ball than that.
Frankly, I think we stood a decent chance of making the playoffs with league-average goaltending. We just sure as hell wouldn't have been #4 in the NHL; we'd have been neck and neck with Toronto.
I'd attribute this to post game hyperbole.
So do you think Wild Beel is going to be a top 6 forward?
Must have been one of those pressers after players asked Torts to not be so hard on them.
But Ryan Murray is not progressing at all !!!!
I did not really mean that. But i thought I would throw it in just to shake up the conversation a little.
Becoming a higher level player doesn't necessarily mean moving from 4C to 1/2C. Comments like those from Torts about Karlsson are likely more about him having the capacity to be a top 3/4C. They're different skillsets, right? You don't develop from a 4 to a 1 in any natural progression because they're completely different roles with different responsibilities. All 3/4C in the league are not equal and the best ones aren't a dime a dozen, nor are they failed 1/2C's. A guy with the skillset to be a great 3/4C is desired in this league and although players can sometimes fit into that role, the ones that are really great are the ones born for it. Wild Lars could be one of those guys, as Torts suggests. I don't expect Torts thinks Karlsson can someday be the next Crosby or Thornton.
I think people tend to forget these kinds of progressions and always focus on bottom -> top and top -> bottom progressions as if it were always something linear.
I presume they're a little more on the ball than that.
Frankly, I think we stood a decent chance of making the playoffs with league-average goaltending. We just sure as hell wouldn't have been #4 in the NHL; we'd have been neck and neck with Toronto.
I do hope that the FO isn't expending any resources to keep Wild Bill.
He's an easily replaceable spare part who went 45 games or so without a goal.
Anyone who real thinks that a player like Karlsson moves the meter for a hockey team in a substantial way doesn't get NHL hockey personnel options. Wild Beel-type players are available all the time during the off season and usually make the waiver wires weekly during the season. As an added bonus, most of them will even throw a check.