joshjull
Registered User
Has there been a definitive clarification on whether he can play in the AHL this year? I know some have raised doubts.
Rasmus has stated multiple times in the Finnish media that if he doesn't make the NHL, he'll come back here. Just to let you know
Defenseman Rasmus Ristolainen is eligible to play for the Rochester Americans, should he not earn a roster spot with the parent Buffalo Sabres during training camp.
The clarification comes this morning from Sabres assistant general manager Kevin Devine, and is presumably due to the NHL contract that the 18-year-old Ristolainen signed on Friday night.
Here we go again... What´s old news is that interview you linked. Risto´s comments were made weeks after that was published. So no, it's not clarified.
He should have no choice. He signed a contract and the Sabres own him. You don't want to go to Rochester? Then fine his ass $10,000 for each day he is in Finland. Sick of these players like Nichushkin crying saying they won't play in the AHL, only the NHL or hell go back to the KHL.
erring on the side of experience, i'm going with the word of an nhl assistant gm vs. an 18 year old.
Sure, sounds reasonable. How about two 18 year olds? And their agents? All I'm saying is, Ristolainen and Barkov have both said in interviews that AHL is not an option for them this season. I wish someone had asked them why exactly, but all I've read is Ristolainen referring to his contract (in Turun Sanomat news paper, the article's not online.) Here's a link to another piece in Finnish:
http://yle.fi/uutiset/rasmus_ristolainen_lahtee_jahtaamaan_nhl-paikkaa/6796359
Translation: Ristolainen's goal is to land a spot on Buffalo's defence right away on his rookie season. If he doesn't succeed, he says he'll return to Turku where he's under contract. QUOTE: "The following years after that AHL becomes an option."
He seems pretty sure about it.
I'm sure he is. However, I'm fairly confident the Sabres understand the type of contract they negotiated with him.
That's all nice that you want to play into his feelings, but that's generally not how it works in pro hockey. Darcy already said he wants him as close to Buffalo as possible. Whatever benefits his career is the best option. At this point, that's probably the NHL. Maybe some AHL time to adjust.I'd rather he go play where he's happy if he's not in the NHL. The system can wait for someone of his talent
He should have no choice. He signed a contract and the Sabres own him. You don't want to go to Rochester? Then fine his ass $10,000 for each day he is in Finland. Sick of these players like Nichushkin crying saying they won't play in the AHL, only the NHL or hell go back to the KHL.
That's all nice that you want to play into his feelings, but that's generally not how it works in pro hockey. Darcy already said he wants him as close to Buffalo as possible. Whatever benefits his career is the best option. At this point, that's probably the NHL. Maybe some AHL time to adjust.
I'd rather he go play where he's happy if he's not in the NHL. The system can wait for someone of his talent
Ignoring sport psychology entirely, the FEL is a comparable league the AHL hence allowing Armia to remain there for two years after his draft. If he's not in the NHL (the predicating factor of my post), his development would likely be comparable if not better there. Add to that the untold benefit of a positive attitude on development and it's a simple choice.
If the Sabres assistant GM saying he can play in the AHL isn't confirmation, what exactly is? Him skating out of the War Memorial tunnel?A few things:
- FEL is a better league than the AHL. In large part that's because it's the top league in its food chain and isn't constantly having important players plucked throughout the season.
- Which of the two leagues is better for developing players is impossible to determine and is obviously a case of circumstance: different players, different teams, different results.
- The question of where he should go if all options are available is thus not a particularly important one. If management feels one avenue is better for Ristolainen, that's that. Ristolainen for his part I'd have to think would be OK with whatever happens because we're really talking at most one season in the AHL. That said, I imagine he'd prefer to play in Finland over the AHL because it's a better, more familiar league. Can't be sure though, he really seems to love North American hockey. Actually, thinking about it, I would think he might prefer the AHL because even if he has to start there, he could be in the NHL within a couple months.
- The real question, though, is whether all options are available, which is what Josh asked. I recall there being a debate about this around the time his contract was signed. JFB seemed to believe strongly that unless something was worked out between the sides, being that he was already under contract in the FEL, the NHL deal he signed is only relevant if he's going to play in the NHL. It seems we've still yet to determine whether or not that is the case; if so, it hasn't been made known whether or not the Sabres have worked something out with their Finnish counterparts.