He's not been good by any stretch this season. I remember when people were claiming that he was our 2nd best defensemen before he even played a game this season and had only played a handful of games in the previous year. It just goes to show that sometimes fans (we) get carried away in playing young guys even when they're not there yet. He better figure it out really soon because with Sanderson knocking on the door he might not have his place on this roster beyond this year, again especially if he doesn't figure it out quick.
He's been really bad defensively and for a guy that we counted on to move the puck he doesn't move the puck very much. Brannstrom has done a much better job at just controlling the play and moving the puck, while he certainly still has a lot of work to do he's been superior to Wolanin in about every way possible.
I don't think Wolanin was ever in the long term plans of the team with Brannstrom, Chabot and Sanderson but it's been dissapointing to see him go this year to say the least. He had an opportunity to be a regular player on the team and he hasn't seized it, maybe even lost his spot with his play.
Yes, Wolanin was probably not in long term plans on LD as the team has Chabot, Sanderson and Brannstrom, 3 high picks with very high pedigree
I totally disagree that "he's been really bad defensively" though. I think it has been magnified by a few plays where he didn't react properly or put himself in a bad position but mostly because the puck actually ended up in the back of the net. I've seen that movie so many times before. Mike Reilly does WORSE several times a game but he still plays over CW. I haven't seen Wolanin get walked easily like Brannstrom by Toffoli yesterday or Gudbranson by Perry on sunday
Of course he's no Chabot (who has made magnifying mistakes too). Zaitsev has rebounded nicely this year (still a borderline top-4 though), Zub has been better that many expected (had him in my lineups before the season) but they are both RD anyway. Brannstrom thankfully has progressed as he is the only piece we have left from losing our best player. Brannstrom has high pedigree but Wolanin hasn't been worse than anybody else. Yes, he made mistakes (like everybody else) but I have watched him closely and seen him make a lot of nice subtle plays to break out attacks or get the puck out of danger. They haven't been caved in when he is on the ice or have given up ton of high danger chances in comparison to others. Advanced stats support this
In total, 9 D-men dressed for the Sens so far this season. This is at even strength :
CF/60 : 6th
CA/60 : 4th (Behind Zub, Brannstrom and Reilly)
CF% : 5th
SF/60 : 6th
SA/60 : 2nd (Behind Zub)
SF% : 5th
SCF/60 : 7th
SCA/60 : 2nd (Behind Zub)
SCF% : 4th
HDCF/60 : 7th
HDCA/60 : 4th (Behind Zub, Brannstrom and Coburn)
HDCF% : 5th
Zub is basically first in all defensive categories, so also on xGA/60 where Wolanin is 2nd. And it's not because he has been "sheltered", with 51.6% dZS% at ES (Zub 52.4%).
In comparison, Brannstrom has 76.3% oZS%
Wolanin played 2:01 on the PK and the other team doesn't even have a shot attempt while he is on the ice. Small sample size for sure
On the PP :
CF/60 : 6th
SF/60 : 6th
SCF/60 : 5th
HDCF/60 : 4th
If anything, it's offensively that I want to see him do more. But like most unexperienced players, he's probably really nervous about not making mistakes and come out of the lineup, which actually happened a few times. He hasn't had the Reilly royal treatment for example.
Sens should sign him to expose him to Seattle, it could be a good place for him