nyrcup94
Registered User
Who is the better prospect and who will be the better player? Will either make the NHL?
Wideman is better right now, Wikstrand has the higher potential impact for the Sens in the future
Vikstrand is a highly cerebral player with elite vision. No comparison between him and a one-trick pony career AHLer lacking any shroud of defensive acumen.
Did I forget to mention that I haven't seen either play? I do know that Dorion once called Vikstrand one of the best D-men outside the NHL and the team seems Richardson-warm on Wideman. Without any firsthand knowledge, I'll go with Vikstrand. Hopefully they're both awesome, natch.
Don't know, don't care until I see them play against other NHLers, or at the very least against the same players.
Wideman is the better fighter.
Don't know, don't care until I see them play against other NHLers, or at the very least against the same players.
The real test is how they fare when paired with Jared "Maybe this Year?" Cowen
What are the people that say Wikstrand going off of ? His body of work is pretty small, and there certainly isn't much of a statistical mass there either.
I don't know what the answer is, but Wideman at least has a body of work to assess.
He does have about 120 games in a pro league (sry, it's 212 between the two SHLs), compared to Wideman's 208...
Not sure what you want really in terms of body of work.
Wideman has the experience on N/A ice,so i gonna go with him too .Wiks may be better later howeverDavid Runblad tore it up with his 153 in the SEL . Lots of big, safe, ice in that league.
David Runblad tore it up with his 153 in the SEL . Lots of big, safe, ice in that league.
Corey Locke and TJ Brennan have torn it up in the AHL; not every player can translate their success from one league to another.
You can find lots of examples from both leagues of players that can't translate to the NHL.