Some players 'shine' in the bigger league. I know it's a stretch but I have the old school mentality; If a 4th line C can win faceoffs I am happy. Haven't seen Weal's faceoff stats in Laval though. But again, even with your dislike, I'm pretty sure you would agree he'd be better at centre than Byron, no? Can we agree atleast on Vejdemo if Evans is to be sidelined for Byron @ C?anyone but Weal, he hasn't even been that good in the AHL.
I acquire a 3c
I use Danault
4D chess
Call it the 1D line thenWe all know that isn't happening; Danualt will never be relegated to #4C...
I acquire a 3c
I use Danault
4D chess
How many teams wants a center now?I acquire a 3c
I use Danault
4D chess
It was a joke, IDGAF about the 4th line C, its inconsequential to the team. The fourth lines crap ? Play ur better lines more. Simple.How many teams wants a center now?
Who are you willing to give for that 3c?
What if we get that C and he becomes quickly a deception while the player we give becomes good?
I think Evans can come back. Or getting a 4c won't hurt the team.
In the summer the new gm could adress the C problem.
Oh I was thinking you were serious. You got me on that one.It was a joke, IDGAF about the 4th line C, its inconsequential to the team. The fourth lines crap ? Play ur better lines more. Simple.
This team sucks, not because the fourth line is bad, but because the top end is bad.
Yes, a better top 4 defender changes the whole team.Oh I was thinking you were serious. You got me on that one.
You're right, what the heck the 4th line.
Anyway the problem start with the D. They are slow, they make mistakes so the C have to play deeper and when they get out of the zone it's time for a line change. The same story is repeating since a month.
I get your point. But at this time the obvious only plausible choice is on the 4th line C. The rest, you know, is not about to change. So let me have some poll fun instead of the usuals make a wish trade threads which are not happening. At least it's realistic.It was a joke, IDGAF about the 4th line C, its inconsequential to the team. The fourth lines crap ? Play ur better lines more. Simple.
This team sucks, not because the fourth line is bad, but because the top end is bad.
I acquire a 3c
I use Danault
4D chess
MehI get your point. But at this time the obvious only plausible choice is on the 4th line C. The rest, you know, is not about to change. So let me have some poll fun instead of the usuals make a wish trade threads which are not happening. At least it's realistic.
Some players 'shine' in the bigger league. I know it's a stretch but I have the old school mentality; If a 4th line C can win faceoffs I am happy. Haven't seen Weal's faceoff stats in Laval though. But again, even with your dislike, I'm pretty sure you would agree he'd be better at centre than Byron, no? Can we agree atleast on Vejdemo if Evans is to be sidelined for Byron @ C?
By the way, remember that the title of the poll says "for the next few games" as in temporary for as long as Byron is the Ducharme choice...
Staal frolik and perry, the oldtimers lineDanault for Staal! Keep Staal until Poehling (or somebody else, maybe Evans if he progresses) takes the spot. Staal is 36 so feasible.